There are two forms of GLOBAL WAR
if it ever happened again.
1.
A MILITARY GLOBAL WAR where Nuclear Weapons
would be the only way to win such a WAR and where that would annihilate all
humankind over a period of time through direct nuclear detonation and the
aftermath fallout if only a few thousand modern nuclear weapons were unleashed
on the world
- An ECONOMIC GLOBAL WAR where by stealth over time
one economic bloc would dominate the economic world order and thereby
control the future world dispatching all others to be submissive to be
subservient to the dominant economic bloc
Both are deadly to humankind and
where one would take a mere few years to wipe out humanity and where the other
would preserve humankind, but where most of the world would be controlled for
centuries in servitude as the equivalent of economic slaves, as the odds to use
the first option of global military war would not be used because of the dire
consequences and the concept of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction).
China overall has been laughing at the West for the past 25-years at least, as the West has poured into wars not mere billions, but trillions of US dollars and where China has not engaged in any wars and using their financial and economic resources into building their economy that is now the 2nd largest economy in the world, if not the no.1 economy in the world. This is where the West has gone completely wrong with its thinking and where economic power is the the greatest power, not military power, as if it were used it would blow all of us out of existence as the only so-called intelligent species in the universe.
China overall has been laughing at the West for the past 25-years at least, as the West has poured into wars not mere billions, but trillions of US dollars and where China has not engaged in any wars and using their financial and economic resources into building their economy that is now the 2nd largest economy in the world, if not the no.1 economy in the world. This is where the West has gone completely wrong with its thinking and where economic power is the the greatest power, not military power, as if it were used it would blow all of us out of existence as the only so-called intelligent species in the universe.
Therefore if one side loses the
economic war, they have lost everything in reality and freedom and independence
over time, would be no more. Therefore it is vital to have a balance in power
whether military or economic. Indeed, there is no difference in really, as one
of the sides would definitely fight to win control over the other). But the big
difference in the two global conflict mechanisms is that economic wars once one
side has gained control, the controlling power bloc controls not just for a
while, but for the centuries to come. Considering these facts it is of overriding
and paramount concern for the West that the unfolding economic war is won or
controlled by western countries, as the alternative would be dire for western
people and as much a catastrophic situation over time as a nuclear war, that
can never be waged if intelligence is used.
So the only ‘global war’ to be
fought now is a global economic war and the Chinese have known this for over
4-decades now. Unfortunately western politicians have had their eye off the
ball for those years and concentrated on military supremacy, ignoring the what
they should have been doing over that time, the securement and wining of the
future economic war. Unfortunately
western politicians still have their eye off the ball and still think that
having the greatest military force in history, that they will always be
supreme. But there they make the cardinal sin of ignorance, as the future world
order will not be secured by ‘bombs and weapons’ (unless you want wiping out as
well in the process), but by totalitarianism in controlling the future global
economics. This is where successive western leaders have been totally lacking
in their thinking, naïve to what is actually going on and allowed a economic
titan like China to build the largest economy in the world in PPP terms, in a mere 4-decades. But the sting in the
tail as yet to come and where China has its eye on future total dominance of all global economics when
it comes to ultimate control.
Unfortunately because successive
western leaders have been concentrating on military control and not economic
control, time is simply running out for nations in the West to counteract the
emerging economic (and now military as well to support and police its eventual
control of global economics), as it takes several decades to develop, construct
and execute on a global scale a project big enough to win the economic war that
now clearly looms throughout the world-at-large. Therefore there is literally
no time to waste and our politicians have to made to see the reality of what is
actually unfolding. I cannot state these words strong enough if the West is to
survive economically in the 1st century and beyond, as once one side
has supremacy, it will be nearly impossible to overturn such immense economic
power.
1. A MILITARY GLOBAL WAR where Nuclear
Weapons would be the only way to win such a WAR and where that would annihilate
all humankind over a period of time through direct nuclear detonation and the
aftermath fallout if only a few thousand modern nuclear weapons were unleashed
on the world
The Second World War was supposed
to be the war to end all wars, just like it was supposed to do with the end of
WW1 in 1918. Indeed when Ike (Dwight D Eisenhower) just before launching
Operation Overlord for the liberation of Europe
from Nazi domination it was stated by the Allied nations that Overlord would,
“decide the destiny of man for
centuries for the battle of Europe and the
world”
But clearly they were not the
wars to end all wars as post history of these two world wars have shown us.
Now though with the advent some
75 years ago of ‘The Bomb’ and thereafter the concept of MAD (Mutually Assured
Destruction) there will never be another major global war if anyone uses commonsense
and if we ignore rightly and completely the concept based on theoretical thinking
in places like the Pentagon that mankind in the form of the USA, could win such
a war. The latter thinking is sheer madness and anyone with any commonsense
should know. Indeed as of 2018 there are approximately 3,750 active
nuclear warheads and 14,485 total nuclear warheads in the world according to "Status
of World Nuclear Forces", Federation of American Scientists,
1
November 2018.
The Tzar Bomba is the largest
nuclear weapon humanity has ever concocted and a real doomsday device where ‘only1
16,000 would make toast the whole planet.
But where also it is estimated that
there are a total of 20,500 nuclear warheads in the world today and where if
the average power of these devices was 33,500 Kilotons, there would be enough
to destroy the earth’s total landmass." - https://gizmodo.com/how-many-nukes-would-it-take-to-blow-up-the-entire-plan-5899569
But where again the nuclear
fallout from the atmosphere would kill off all humanity with a fraction of
these numbers over a relatively short period in time and probably in the order
of a mere 5,000 to 8,000 nuclear weapons being used against humanity and where
this equates to approximately an area of 85 miles x 85 miles of atmospheric
fallout per nuclear weapon to do its worst in annihilating humankind for ever
and destroying all carbon life forms as we know them today. Indeed if there
were by luck a few survivors, it would dispatch them to a life of where we were
tens of thousands of years ago, but where also all future human offsprings for millennium,
would suffer deformities inflicted by such a nuclear holocaust.
Only a madman therefore would set
alight the chain reaction that would lead to humanity’s total demise. Indeed,
even US
THEREFORE A TRULY GLOBAL NUCLEAR WAR WILL NEVER HAPPEN IF COMMONSENSE
IS USED BY ANYONE IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS, FOR ANY MADMAN WOULD BE ASSASSINATED
BEFORE THEY COULD ISSUE THE FINAL ACTION.
Therefore having stated the
above, this does not mean that smaller tactical weapons might not be used in
anger and by mistake, but where again such an event would be stopped before all
hell was let loose, due to the fact of MAD being implemented.
BUT THERE IS THOUGH A FAR GREATER WAR
THAT WILL BE WAGED ON THE HORIZON FOR MANKIND AND THAT WAR IS THE GLOBAL
ECONOMIC WAR TO DOMINATE THE WORLD ORDER OVER THE UNFOLDING CENTURIES
(A far more devastating war as it will
go on in perpetuity and be never-ending)
In this respect there is an
unperceived global war in its
magnitude and where it is just as deadly a global war as previous world
wars and even more so, that is now being played out today for the economic
supremacy between the East and the West. For the side who losses this war of
all wars (note not the war to stop all wars) will be just as devastating in
human terms as a Nuclear war (although not the annihilation of humans, there
will be deaths due to the subservient effect), as economic global wars are
continuous without relent.
It takes decades to build such a
balancing economic strategy and why it is taking until 2049 by the Chinese to
implement their BRI that will dominate the world’s future economic development
and thereby be the greatest threat to the future prosperity and wellbeing of
all western nations’. This should be clear and where common-sense again dictates
that if one side had a unequivocal overriding economic strength over another
economic block, that latter will suffer unimaginable economic consequences.
Presently the West has nothing of the vast economic magnitude of the BRI and
therefore will eventual succumb and fail at the hands of such pre-eminent
economic power. For it is simply the law of the economic jungle and the law
that determines between the strong and the weak throughout the world and where
there is no finer tool to implement such a strategy as controlling the
technologies of the future, but where they need the world’s natural resources
to drive that strategy. This is what the
Chinese BRI is all about – Economic CONTROL.
So consequently the West has nothing like the
equivalent of the BRI and to ignore this fact is sheer negligence of the very
highest order on the part of all western politicians and their leaders. For it
would be the ultimate act of negligence against their people who would suffer
immensely without the mechanism to counteract this unprecedented economic
power. But that is where we are presently heading as no western political
leader is even possibly aware of the unparalleled economic threat that lies on
the horizon for all western people with the ramifications and outfall that this
unmatched economic behemoth threat from the BRI will bring to them. All they
apparently see is perceive benefits that are in essence a smokescreen and where
because western political leaders per se, are not tech literate and naïve to
what technology can do in economic reality terms (they do not understand the
in-depth fundamental forces that are in play and involved…they know that they
work, but do not know really their pre-eminent importance) and therefore are totally
blind to the threat that the BRI will bring in a mere few decades from now to
all western nations.
Complacency of Western Politicians
It is called setting up your economic
and business ‘stall’ in the long-term and simple terms where the Chinese are
doing this in earnest and the West are just sitting back thinking that there
are no threats near them and just like the United States did with the advent of
Pearl Harbour. Indeed complacency is rife within all western politicians presently
and true to form this will continue to be the case as well and as history has
recorded for again our politicians are not equipped with the right knowledge
base to know what is exactly going on. For they presently perceive that they
are invincible like all predominant power bases of the past have thought in
their naivety believed. As nothing is said by them about threats other than in
their minds that of military conflict,
not that of the more corrosive conflict, economic wars that go on forever.
There are Two Distinct Future World Orders
The destiny of humanity and the
West in particular can be viewed as two different future scenarios. These will
decide whether the West will still be the free world by 2050 or not. Indeed, it
is time that western politicians and leaders woke up and smelled the coffee
before we have not the lead-time in the West to build our economic defences,
for these take several decades to construct and just like again the Chinese are
providing with their Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The big question is
though, will our political leaders in the West open up their eyes and minds for
once to this unprecedented threat on western economic living standards and the
wellbeing of all western people?
1. The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative
(BRI) with no Global Economic Deterrent in the West
What is the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)?
1.1 The
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a global development strategy
adopted by the Chinese government involving infrastructure development and
investments in 152 countries and international organizations in Asia, Europe,
Africa, the Middle East, and the Americas Silk Road Economic Belt"; whereas
"road" refers to the sea routes, or the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road
1.2 The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is an
immensely ambitious development campaign to boost trade and stimulate economic
growth across Asia and beyond. – Chatham House, UK
The BRI is therefore a massive
long-term economic strategy by the Chinese to bring together a significant
number of countries into what can be viewed as an integrated China and that at
its heart is their global ambitions to dominate world trade if people use their
intelligence and common-sense. For one has to ask oneself, why would China
invest up to a possible $12 trillion into such a scheme if it were not
strategically significant for China’s ambitions, as no country is a
philanthropist in giving to others. Therefore the whole purpose of the BRI is
to dominate world trade from 2049 onwards and where the West have no answers to
this unprecedented economic power presently, only military power and where this
for the reasons stated previously, will be impotent against such an enormous
Chinese economic vehicle for global domination in trade and that will provide
no redress to this unparalleled power – not even in the history of the USA has
anything like this ever happened before and Silicone Valley will be seen in
comparison as a mere historical ‘storm in
a teacup’ in comparison to the vast power global change dynamics of the
BRI.
But again our western politicians
are totally ignorant of these facts and how it will change the world order in
economics terms. Indeed it will have the effect to provide unimaginable and
unprecedented wealth for China and Asia but where on the other side of the coin
created an environment in the West of a continual downward spiral in the living
standards and wellbeing of all western nations, as the BRI on behalf of the
China, For as we all know or should know, there are always winners and losers
in this world and where China would not be investing up to $12 trillion in the
BRI for control of the world markets of tomorrow, if they were not coming out the winners.
In this respect you will have
noticed over the past 4-decades that China has not been involved in a single
military conflict, but where they have unlike the West been silently to a great
degree, building their economic power and the global strategy that they adopted
some 40 years ago. This has been at total odds with the West which has been
embroiled with war after war and where this has drained vast financial and
economic recourses from all western nations that they could have used in
developing further their economies and making a better life for their
respective people.
Indeed, some macroeconomists have
determined that over the last 25 years alone western military intervention have
cost between $12 trillion and $20 trillion (the latter approximately being 25%
of all total global GDP).
To give a flavour of what is to
come in terms of dire ramifications for us in the West, the following gives an
indication observed by macro observers and experts.
In this respect the following are
extracts from an article by Rick Mills of Ahead
of the Herd and entitled, “The Beginning of the End
of the Dollar”
(For the full article use the following
weblink
One Belt, One Road
Promising over a trillion dollars in infrastructure spending in 60
countries, including a 260-mile railway spanning eight countries, power plants
in Pakistan, and a Chinese-owned port in Greece to give it an artery for goods
flowing to Europe, One Belt, One Road is China's "great pivot east."
As the Independent described it in 2017:
It is global commerce on China China China
The projects inherently serve China China
In other words, One Belt, One
Road
The "Belt" refers to a network of overland road and rail routes and oil and natural gas pipelines planned to
run along the major Eurasian land bridges—China-Mongolia-Russia, China-Central
and West Asia, China-Indochina Peninsula, China-Pakistan,
Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar. They'll stretch from Xi'an
in central China through
Central Asia reaching as far as Moscow , Rotterdam and Venice
The "Road" is a network of ports and other coastal infrastructure
projects from South and Southeast Asia to East Africa and the northern Mediterranean Sea .
"A network of new "South-South" trading routes connecting
Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America
are set to revolutionize the global economy. Trade and capital flows between
emerging areas of the world could increase tenfold in the next forty years. In
the same way that trade between the developed nations exploded in the 1950s and
1960s, we expect the 21st Century to see turbocharged trade growth between the
emerging nations." HSBC Global Research
"In all trade corridors in which China
The China Global Investment Tracker is a comprehensive data
set covering China
An article published by the New York Times, 'The World According to China ,' by Gregor Aisch, Josh Keller and
K.K.Rebecca Lai says China
has displaced the United States
and Europe as the leading financial power in
large parts of the developing world. Here's where China has the most influence, based on its
share of foreign investment since 2005.
Where Chinese companies once struggled to win orders in a competitive global market, that is starting to change, thanks to, ironically, the Chinese countervailing duties, which are making locally made goods cheaper than their American-made counterparts. When Chinese citizens buy Chinese goods, the government is happy—the opposite of what Trump intended by his tariffs.
The miscalculation is laid thread-bare in an interesting recent article:
In real life, Trump's tariffs are unlikely to inflict enough pain on China to compel Xi to make concessions. Its huge domestic market is becoming more important to Chinese growth. But beyond even that, Beijing's entire economic strategy is designed to replace critical foreign technology and products with homegrown alternatives it can control. Simply, the Communist Party prefers Chinese to buy Xiaomi phones and Geely cars, not iPhones and Buicks.
That's exactly what the much-feared "Made in China 2025" program is all about. The plan is to develop new, high-tech industries to compete with and eventually replace foreign rivals, at home and abroad. In that sense, it's official policy to limit overseas involvement in the economy.
The trade war, therefore, comes as a "blessing in disguise," as the China Daily put it. Trump's trade sanctions have given Beijing another excuse to drag its feet on free-market reforms, to support local companies and to harass and exclude foreign business—all things Chinese leaders are inclined to do anyway. - Bloomberg
One can see this in "The Made in China 2025 Technical Roadmap," better known as "The Green Book" after its original cover. The book is full of ambitious targets "that if met would virtually lock foreign companies out of many industrial segments in China and threaten market disruption for businesses across the globe," another article states:
The Green Book breaks down targets for dozens of industries that supply the 10 key sectors prioritized by Made in China 2025, which also include biotechnology, advanced rail equipment, and agricultural machinery. It sees Chinese companies taking a 56 percent share of the global market and 80 percent of the domestic market for integrated circuits by 2030. By 2025, they're seen controlling 90 percent of the domestic market for new-energy vehicles including hybrid and pure electric cars, domestic mobile communication equipment, key parts of industrial robots, new energy, renewable energy equipment and energy storage equipment.
In part because of the targets, foreign companies in industries including medical devices and advanced agricultural equipment—both priority industries in the Made in China 2025 plan—may already be losing business, says the U.S.-China Business Council. - Bloomberg
See below for a table of which industries are targeted.
Where Chinese companies once struggled to win orders in a competitive global market, that is starting to change, thanks to, ironically, the Chinese countervailing duties, which are making locally made goods cheaper than their American-made counterparts. When Chinese citizens buy Chinese goods, the government is happy—the opposite of what Trump intended by his tariffs.
The miscalculation is laid thread-bare in an interesting recent article:
In real life, Trump's tariffs are unlikely to inflict enough pain on
That's exactly what the much-feared "Made in China 2025" program is all about. The plan is to develop new, high-tech industries to compete with and eventually replace foreign rivals, at home and abroad. In that sense, it's official policy to limit overseas involvement in the economy.
The trade war, therefore, comes as a "blessing in disguise," as the
One can see this in "The Made in China 2025 Technical Roadmap," better known as "The Green Book" after its original cover. The book is full of ambitious targets "that if met would virtually lock foreign companies out of many industrial segments in
The Green Book breaks down targets for dozens of industries that supply the 10 key sectors prioritized by Made in China 2025, which also include biotechnology, advanced rail equipment, and agricultural machinery. It sees Chinese companies taking a 56 percent share of the global market and 80 percent of the domestic market for integrated circuits by 2030. By 2025, they're seen controlling 90 percent of the domestic market for new-energy vehicles including hybrid and pure electric cars, domestic mobile communication equipment, key parts of industrial robots, new energy, renewable energy equipment and energy storage equipment.
In part because of the targets, foreign companies in industries including medical devices and advanced agricultural equipment—both priority industries in the Made in China 2025 plan—may already be losing business, says the U.S.-China Business Council. - Bloomberg
Other determinants of China China
has with Russia
"In the process of in,ternationalization of the yuan we have taken
sufficient measures that from now on will allow the yuan to be used in trade
and investment. Moreover, the yuan has been included in the SDR currency
basket. The key procedures have already been carried out… As for the future
role of the government or the Central Bank in the internationalization of the
yuan, to my mind, it is still possible to do something to establish
communication between domestic and international capital markets," - Zhou Xiaochuan, Governor of the People's Bank of China stated at a press conference in September
2018
Writing on the Wall
Therefore the writing is on the
wall, but western politicians are not devising or even considering developing a
mechanism to counteract thus vast change of economic power to China, but where
the ramifications for western people will be absolutely horrendous
as China takes over the world trade order with the inevitable decline in
the wellbeing of people in the West that will take its toll including famine
and loss of freedoms never seen before,
not even in British feudal times. But of course the rich and powerful with
their politicians who have created this unimaginable outcome for their people,
will have created unprecedented human suffering that will be indefinite due to the war being economic in nature not
global military war and where the unthinkable case of MAD would most likely be
unleashed. Therefore the West has no option if it is sane but to create a vast
economic deterrent to counteract and protect its people with when viewing what
is on the future horizon of time and before it is all far too late to do
anything about this clearly emerging Chinese subjugation paradigm.
Again our political leaders in
the West are blind to what is really going on here, as nothing whatsoever in
any meaningful way is being undertaken to counterbalance and exceed this threat
against all that western people hold so dear.
If they were, something
remarkable would have been jointly proposed, but nothing.
-
2. An ECONOMIC GLOBAL WAR where by stealth over time
one economic bloc would dominate the economic world order and thereby
control the future world dispatching all others to be submissive to be
subservient to the dominant economic bloc
-
The West’s ORE-STEM Initiative (to
counteract the BRI in the West)
The ORE China
As the full operational details
are complex, but where they have been thought out by many leading minds in science, technology, engineering,
economics and mathematical application (STEEMA) where up to 100 member Nobel
laureates were consulted, it is appropriate for confidentiality reasons and the
definite unparallel Chinese socio- economic threat, to just state the
following.
The ORE-STEM brings together,
2.1
All the creative and innovative thoughts of the people
in the West that would be on a continuous time cycle and also all those from
other nations who want to be a part of this new global world development
mechanism that protects humankind and does not allow all the economic power to
be in the hands of China in this century and beyond.
2.2
All western scientists, technologists, engineers,
economists and mathematicians.2.3 All western universities and research institutions
2.4 All western corporations and businesses
2.5 All western investors.
2.6 All western politicians
2.7 The most important part that makes all this possible, but where China can never know what this is for obvious reasons, as otherwise they could use this 7th and unparalleled vital economic change-master for their own economic domination purposes and that can literally never happen, as all would be totally lost.
By doing this we concentrate our
economic fire power like never before in the West and where it is so powerful
that no economic bloc can equal or surpass it. For overall, it is the only
alternative available that is capable of overcoming the immense Chinese threat
and thereby securing in perpetuity the wellbeing of all western people. For
without this dominant counteracting and huge STEEMA development in the West, we
shall certainly fall under the immense power of China
The ‘Final Word’, as nothing will happen unless the following happens and
where this will basically decide whether the people in the West have a meaningful
future or not in this century and beyond
Wake up ‘western politicians’ as 2049
will soon be with us. For time is literally running out for western people and
to prevent the worst future scenario that many cannot currently imagine.
Dr David Hill
Chief ExecutiveWorld Innovation Foundation (UK)
17 May 2019
References:
Be Afraid?
Be Very Afraid? — Why the United States
Needs a Counterstrategy to China
World is in two minds on China
The Beginning of the End of the Dollar - https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2018/09/18/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-dollar.html
Belt and Road
Initiative - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
China Is Quietly Reshaping the World - The
staggering scope of the country’s infrastructure initiative—and what it means
for the international order - https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/china-belt-and-road/542667/
Real trade war: Trump fixates on tariffs while China
Examining the Debt Implications
of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective - https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/examining-debt-implications-belt-and-road-initiative-policy-perspective.pdf
WHEN CURRENCY
EMPIRES FALL - https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-wzGGxWPMvkJ:https://www.gresham.ac.uk/lecture/transcript/print/when-currency-empires-fall/+&cd=14&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk
Pros and cons of Belt and Road Initiative, implications for Turkey
Global Risk Insight
- https://globalriskinsights.com/tag/belt-and-road-initiative/
What you need to know about China
Is time up for the US Mountain of US Debt
