Sunday 29 September 2024

White House Silent as Data Reveals How Many Illegal Alien Criminals Are Roaming Free in America


Blogger Comment: Just a few words here..."This is the greatest disaster on American mainland soil EVER"...

The Biden-Harris White House is remaining silent after new data was released showing the number of dangerous criminal illegal aliens have been allowed to freely roam the streets across America.

New data released to lawmakers shows the number of illegal aliens with convictions for sex offenses and homicide who are not in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention.

The agency provided data to Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) about illegals with criminal charges or convictions.

The data, as of July 2024, is broken down by those in detention and those who are not in detention, known as the non-detained docket.

The non-detained docket includes noncitizens who have final orders of removal or are going through removal proceedings but are not in ICE custody.

There are more than 7.4 million people on that docket, up from around 3.7 million when President Donald Trump left office.

The data shows that, among those not in detention, there are 425,431 convicted criminals and 222,141 with pending criminal charges.

The data does not reveal how many of those criminals are recent arrivals.

For comparison, in August 2016, toward the end of the Obama administration, ICE said there were about 2.2 million noncitizens on the non-detained docket.

This included 368,574 convicted criminals.

In the latest data, the criminals include 62,231 convicted of assault, 14,301 convicted of burglary, 56,533 with drug convictions and 13,099 convicted of homicide.

An additional 2,521 have kidnapping convictions, and 15,811 have sexual assault convictions.

There are an additional 1,845 with pending homicide charges, 42,915 with assault charges, 3,266 with burglary charges and 4,250 with assault charges.

The White House has so far refused to comment on the data and whether it had been aware of the numbers.

Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris is currently at the southern border in Arizona but she has not commented on the data.

The news sparked outrage from Republicans.

GOP lawmakers tied the numbers to the policies of the Biden-Harris administration and those “sanctuary” jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with ICE.

Gonzales called the data “beyond disturbing.”

“It should be a wake-up call for the Biden-Harris administration and cities across the country that hide behind sanctuary policies,” he noted in a statement.

“It’s time for Washington to move past rhetoric and toward results.

“Americans deserve to feel safe in their communities. As an appropriator, I will do everything in my power to ensure ICE has the resources necessary to deport noncitizens with a criminal record.

“This must be a priority,” Gonzales said.

“The Biden-Harris administration also plays a part in cleaning up the mess their failed policies have created.

“They have the ear of sanctuary city mayors. It’s time to encourage them to reverse course and put the safety of American citizens first.”

Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green said the release of illegal aliens into the U.S. “defies all common sense.”

“This is madness,” he said.

“It is something no civilized, well-functioning society should tolerate.”

In the letter to Gonzales, ICE took aim at so-called “sanctuary” cities that refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement in deporting illegal alien criminals.

“ICE recognizes that some jurisdictions are concerned that cooperating with federal immigration officials will erode trust with immigrant communities and make it harder for local law enforcement to serve those populations,” the letter states.

“However, ‘sanctuary’ policies can end up shielding dangerous criminals, who often victimize those same communities.”

It also stressed DHS’s efforts to remove illegal immigrants.

“From mid-May 2023 through the end of July 2024, DHS removed or returned more than 893,600 individuals, including more than 138,300 individuals in family units.

“The majority of all individuals encountered at the Southwest Border over the past three years have been removed, returned or expelled.”

The Biden administration has prioritized the removal of public safety and national security threats in narrowed priorities it released in 2021, but critics have linked those priorities with a drop in ICE removals.

Republicans have blamed the border crisis on the policies of the administration, including rolling back Trump policies that limited “catch and release.”

The administration has said it needs more funding and reforms from Congress, including via a bipartisan Senate bill introduced this year.

That bill would increase the number of ICE detention beds, but critics of the administration have pointed to numbers showing not all beds are being filled currently.

The White House refuses to comment about the increase in the non-detained docket this summer,

Instead, a White House spokesperson pointed to that bill.

“Congressional Republicans had an opportunity to support the fairest and toughest set of reforms in decades, and they chose to put partisan political interests ahead of fixing our immigration system and securing our borders,” the spokesperson said.

“Congressional Republicans have proven that they do not care about securing our border because, frankly, if they did, they would have supported the bipartisan agreement.”

The data’s release comes as Harris visits the southern border in Arizona.

Her campaign seeks to present Harris as tougher on the border than President Trump, who she blames for the border bill not passing.

“Donald Trump tanked a bill to improve border security — just so he can win this election,” she said Friday.

“As I have shown throughout my career, I won’t back down from my plan to make our border more secure.”

It wasn’t clear which elements of her career Harris was referencing.



And,
Posted by at No comments:

Joe Rogan Warns Kamala Harris Will Destroy Free Speech If Elected


Blogger Comment: What Rogan states here is 100% right and where even very close buddies to Biden and HARRIS the UN and the mega-rich Globalist WEF have stated also, so you know that it is assured, but NOT under Trump, who will' NEVER' have the American people censored and where he has stated so...
Podcaster Joe Rogan has warned his millions of viewers and listeners that Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris will destroy Americans’ free speech rights if she’s elected president in November.

During his show “The Joe Rogan Experience,” the host said the First Amendment will be under serious threat because of how extreme Harris and her running mate Tim Walz are.

Rogan issued the warning this week while talking with his guest, former U.S. Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan.

Speaking the political Left’s desire to censor speech, Rogan said:

“I don’t think it turns around if Kamala Harris gets into office, I think they clamp down more.

“I think the same stuff that they were trying to do with Twitter, they’ll try to do with something else and with other things — they’ve already openly discussed it.”

“You know, she’s openly discussed that the same rules have to apply to Facebook, they have to apply to Twitter, and that Elon Musk could lose his privileges,” he continued.

“There are so many wild things that they’re saying.

“Tim Walz said that the First Amendment doesn’t apply to misinformation or hate speech.”

He noted that the First Amendment is about protecting speech, including speech that is factually wrong.

Rogan explained that speech should need to be approved by Democrats and left-wing “fact-checkers” for it to be allowed.

He said that he was alarmed by how government officials used the COVID-19 pandemic to censor people.

Most of that censorship was aimed at people who spoke out against the government’s tyrannical abuse of power.

Rogan noted that much of the so-called “disinformation” that people were censored for was later proven to be true.

“How about masks don’t work?” Rogan said.

“You would get screamed at for saying masks don’t work.

“Well, guess what?” Rogan asked.

“They don’t work. They don’t work.

“Fauci said masks don’t work.

“Remember that interview before the pandemic, before they knew how big it was gonna be?

“He was like, you don’t have to wear a mask.

“Then it was wear two, then it was put two face diapers on.

“It’s bananas how easily people fell in line.

“That scared me the most.”

WATCH:

0:05
0:00 / 1:58




And,
Posted by at No comments:

Republican Bill Eliminates Covid 'Vaccine' Maker Protections to Unleash Wave of Lawsuits


Blogger Comment: This is about time and where Biden and HARRIS have not even investigated the claims of major side effects and even deaths after the use of these 'Experimental' mRNA injections...not once and very strange indeed, as after the 2009 Swine Flu jab had just a few fatalities and a couple of hundred serious side effects recorded nationally when Republican US President Bush Jr was in power, they shut the jabs down and where they were not even the experimental mRNA technology then, but although still experimental jabs...therefore Biden and HARRIS are culpable in preventing the harms that have occurred to millions of Americans from these experimental Covid-19  injections and what is now known to be perfectly true coming from the highly censored section of the medical research fraternity of the USA and wordwide...

A new Republican bill seeks to eliminate the protections afforded to vaccine manufacturers that prevent them from being sued for killing and injuring citizens with Covid mRNA shots.

The legislation was proposed by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ).

Gosar’s bill seeks to “amend the Public Health Service Act to end the liability shield for vaccine manufacturers and for other purposes.”

Under the bill, all vaccine makers’ waiver of liability would end in a sweeping proposed legal change in the form of a rejection of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Act.

The legislation is titled, “End the Vaccine Carveout Act.”

Gosar, a major supporter of President Donald Trump, represents a vast strip of heavily rural western Arizona that reaches the fringe western edges of the Phoenix suburbs.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).

The NCVIA was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on November 14, 1986.

The NCVIA’s goals were to:

  • Ensure a stable supply of vaccines
  • Stabilize vaccine costs
  • Provide a cost-effective way to resolve vaccine injury claims
  • Protect vaccine manufacturers from financial liability

The VICP is a no-fault alternative to the traditional U.S. legal system for resolving vaccine injury claims.

Individuals who believe they were injured by a covered vaccine can file a petition with the VICP.

The VICP’s process involves the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters.

The system provides compensation for medical care, rehabilitation, counseling, vocational training, pain and suffering, and diminished earning capacity.

If a vaccine-related death occurs, surviving family members receive $250,000.

The program is funded through the collection of a 75-cent excise tax on vaccine manufacturers for every dose of those vaccines that Congress includes in the program before they are allowed to pursue a civil action for an amount greater than $1,000.

The VICP was created after lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers and healthcare providers threatened to reduce vaccination rates and cause vaccine shortages.

So, under this current law, persons injured from a vaccine must first seek and either accept or reject compensation from the VICP.

Gosar’s package of documentation associated with the bill includes research into why the current laws create too many victims, compromised science, state-backed profit grabs, and more.

Many people adversely affected by vaccines have no options.

In civil cases outside of the VICP, for example, a plaintiff cannot earn compensation for certain “unavoidable” injuries.

Additionally, any case that rests “solely” on a manufacturer’s “failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party” will simply be tossed out by the judge.

Or on the contrary, a plaintiff must prove that the vaccine manufacturer either committed “fraud,” or intentionally withheld “information relating to the safety or efficacy of vaccines.”

If a pharmaceutical company “failed to exercise due care” in following federal law regulating vaccines, the claim must be backed up “by clear and convincing evidence.”

The current legislation from a consumer protection lens creates a nearly impossible bar to surpass for many classes of plaintiffs and places limitations on those who do suffer from injury or loss of life of a loved one, for example.

Problematically, Gosar’s bill notes that “There is an unfortunate lack of science regarding the safety of vaccines.”

For this claim of a lack of science behind the vaccines, Gosar’s bill includes a citation to The Institute of Medicine (IOM), renamed the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

NAM is a nonprofit composed of top medical and health professionals that was founded to assist the U.S. government.

The organization published a report in 2011 entitled “Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality.”

According to the bill’s supporting documentation, “Although federal agencies insist that vaccines are safe, there is an unfortunate dearth of science relating to studies exonerating vaccines from causing dangerous side effects.”

Gosar’s bill calls on lawmakers to “end the liability shield for vaccine manufacturers.”

If passed, certain sections of the current law would be amended.

It would allow full litigation for damages against pharmaceutical companies manufacturing vaccines.

As a result, Covid vaccine manufacturers would face a wave of lawsuits from those injured by mRNA shots and the families of those who were killed by the shots.



And,
Posted by at No comments:

Sudden Infant Deaths Surged after Covid 'Vaccine' Rollout, Study Confirms


A disturbing new study has confirmed that sudden infant deaths surged dramatically after Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out for public use.

The study was conducted by a team of top researchers at the Pennsylvania State College of Medicine.

The results of the study were published Thursday (Sept. 26, 2024) in the JAMA medical journal.

The study found that sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) increased slightly in 2020 after restrictions were implemented during the pandemic.

However, when Covid mRNA injections were rolled out for public use in 2021, cases of SUID and SIDS skyrocketed.

In the “Findings” section of the study’s paper, the researchers write:

“In this cross-sectional study of 14,308 SUID cases, the risk of SUID and SIDS increased during the intra-pandemic period (March 2020 to December 2021) compared with the pre-pandemic period (March 2018 to December 2019), with the greatest increases noted in 2021 (9% for SUID and 10% for SIDS).

“A marked statistically significant monthly increase in SUID from June to December 2021 was observed.”

The researchers found that there was an uptick in infant deaths beginning in July 2020 after masking, lockdowns, and other restrictions were implemented.

However, between June 2021 and December 2021, there was a stomach-churning surge of up to 14 percent.

Covid injections were first rolled out in early 2021 and expanded for use on children later in the year.

In the “Results” section of the paper, the researchers note:

“Monthly assessments revealed an increased risk of SUID beyond the prepandemic baseline starting in July 2020, with a pronounced epidemiologic shift from June to December 2021 (ranging from 10% to 14%).”

The researchers defined these deadly syndromes as umbrella terms for babies who died.

As Slay News recently reported, scientists have now confirmed people are dying from a deadly post-Covid injection “syndrome.”

In the “Introduction” section of the paper, the researchers explain:

“Sudden unexpected infant death is an umbrella term used to describe the sudden death of an infant younger than 1 year for whom the cause of death is not apparent prior to investigation.

“Deaths from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), which occur during sleep and remain unexplained after a thorough postmortem investigation, comprise more than one-third of SUID cases”

Interestingly, however, the researchers failed to link the infant deaths to the obvious correlations with the mRNA “vaccines.”

Instead, they suggest the infant death surge was caused by “altered infectious disease transmission.”

In the “Meaning” section, the researchers write:

“These findings suggest that the pronounced shift in SUID epidemiology during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic may be associated with altered infectious disease transmission at the time.”

The researchers even included the Covid injections in their analysis.

However, they insist that the deaths were not caused by the vaccine’s side effects.

Instead, they claim that the vaccine’s justification for engaging in public activities was more likely to blame because infants were more exposed to Covid.

In the “Discussion” section, the researchers state:

“As COVID-19 vaccines became available in 2021, pandemic precautions were lifted across the US, with schools and workplaces reopening and social gatherings resuming.

“As a result, the second year of the pandemic saw resurgences of seasonal respiratory viruses at unexpected times and with increased severity.”

However, babies and children have never been at risk from Covid and there is no evidence of an increase in deaths from the virus.

In fact, a major study recently found no children had died from Covid, whether they had received the “vaccine” or not.

However, the researchers did mention a causal link between baby death syndrome following RSV vaccination.

In the “Conclusions” section, they note:

“It may be particularly interesting to evaluate SUID rates following the rollout of several new RSV countermeasures, including maternal RSV vaccination and infant nirsevimab administration.

“Data such as ours may help theorize plausible causal pathways and potential mitigable risk factors to further reduce the risk of SUID.”



And,
Posted by at No comments:

Bill Gates Funding Scheme to Promote 'Climate Change' Agenda in Corporate Media Reports


Blogger Comment: This man is the greatest-ever gloom-and-doom merchant of all time and all for vast wealth for himself and where if it is not the mRNA harm-vaccines, is global collapse which is a full anathema to the 'real' TRUTH, and not for the people I can assure you that 100% and not one iota or 0.000001% is the TRUTH that Gates spews out all the time for his own pocket...for just a single little piece of evidence and from The Washington Post this month (September 2024), that published a chart showing the Earth’s current mean surface temperature which is actually around the lowest it has been in the past 485 million years.

Bill Gates and other liberal donors are funding a new scheme that seeks to inject narratives into corporate media reports to promote the globalist “climate change” agenda.

Some of America’s largest liberal organizations are involved in the scheme, including the Microsoft co-founder’s Gates Foundation.

The plan seeks to encourage and reward journalists who push “global warming” narratives in their news reports.

The scheme has been dubbed the Climate Blueprint for Media Transformation.

It emerged from a 2023 green agenda conference sponsored by the Solutions Journalism Network and Covering Climate Now.

The Solutions Journalism Network is funded by several left-wing foundations, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Hewlett Foundation.

The Gates Foundation has been instrumental in the war on food by pushing for restrictions on meat and dairy products.

Gates has also been heavily involved in the push to replace meat and dairy with lab-grown products and insect-based “foods.”

Meanwhile, the Hewlett Foundation has a track record of working to influence reporters.

Their influence can be seen in the Climate Blueprint, a 14-part guide for how journalists should insert green agenda narratives into their reporting.

Each section of the document is written by a different journalist or activist.

It covers subjects ranging from “Community Engagement” to “Climate Justice.”

The Climate Blueprint opens with a section called “The Everything Story.”

In this section, Covering Climate Now deputy director Andrew McCormick encourages journalists to “take bold action.”

McCormick argues that journalists should make stories on “every beat,” including crime and sports, about “climate change.”

Covering Climate Now co-founder Kyle Pope echoed his colleague’s advice in the Columbia Journalism Review Monday.

Pope complained that the Kardashian family received more coverage than alleged rising ocean temperatures.

He also claimed that “global warming” has begun to be covered only “very recently.”

In response, Pope urged journalists to step up and “tell the most important story on Earth.”

In the Blueprint’s section, on “Community Engagement,” “India Currents” audience engagement editor Prachi Singh provides guidelines for reporters.

Singh says that “reporters need to shift from chasing deadlines to meaningfully connecting” with “women, people of color, Indigenous peoples, the LGBTQIA+ community,” and other groups he claims are more affected by the so-called “climate crisis.”

Investigative reporter Amy Westervelt explicitly urges journalists to paint anyone involved with the fossil fuel industry as a villain.

Westervelt urges reporters to find universities that take money from energy companies and build relationships with “one professor who doesn’t particularly like the arrangement,” presumably to have him criticize his employer.

Meanwhile, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jennifer Oldham encourages reporters to “put in the time to gain activists’ trust.”

Oldham notes that “validation is paramount” and offers tips for reporters to “best cover climate campaigns in order to give them the weight they deserve.”

“Be intentional with your language,” is one of Oldham’s tips.

“Do you call an event a ‘demonstration; or a ‘riot’?” Oldham asks.

“Words matter. Calling an encounter a ‘violent clash with police’ criminalizes demonstrators without offering a comparable criticism of law enforcement’s actions.”

The Climate Blueprint calls for reporters to go all-in on fearmongering about the alleged “climate crisis.”

However, it also warns that doing so could be traumatic for journalists.

In the Blueprint, Yessenia Funes, “a New York-based queer Latina journalist,” writes:

“Leadership at the publication has taken thoughtful steps to lighten the workload in summer, when heat-driven extreme weather — from wildfires to hurricanes — worsens.

“By getting ahead on stories during the lull of winter and spring, the team isn’t overwhelmed by the onslaught of tragedy after summer tragedy.”

“Ultimately, climate and environmental reporters can’t carry this burden alone,” Funes adds.

“It is incumbent on the industry to take the time to build resources professionals urgently need — including access to high-quality health care and flexible work schedules that give journalists the time they need to pause and reflect on the stories they’re responsible for sharing and the emotions they’re silently carrying.”

The push to inject more hysteria into reporting comes amid mounting evidence that the warnings about the “climate crisis” have been overblown.

The Washington Post this month published a chart showing the Earth’s current mean surface temperature is actually around the lowest it has been in the past 485 million years.

This year also marks the deadline for the Pentagon’s 2004 predictions in a report to President George W. Bush.

At the time, the report claimed that in 20 years, “climate change” would wreak havoc on the world.

It said “global warming” would turn the United Kingdom’s climate “Siberian” and lead to nuclear conflict, drought, and famine.

None of those predictions have come to pass.



And,
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)