Wednesday 24 April 2024

WEF Calls for '24-Hour Monitoring' of the Public



Blogger Comment: These people are literally mad...as they now want to invade your body...do you really want this as all these experimental things....like the experimental mRNA Vaxxes and the forced jabs, have had serious side effect across the world including tens of millions of mortalities and our politicians are doing jack-all...showing that they are heavily involved with this insane crowd at the WEF...this next stage will just be as harmful to humanity and again, our politicians will do nothing, as these Globalist elites and the political would b's are all bought and sold by these people even before they get elected...but their wealth and power gets them there to the top in politics and from thereon, they are not working full time for you or me, but for the Globalists who mown them...period 


The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for the “24-hour monitoring” of the general public using “biometric sensors—on, or even inside their bodies.”

Details of the plan were revealed by Yuval Noah Harari, a senior advisor to the WEF and its founder Klaus Schwab.

According to Harari, a self-described “transhumanist” who is credited as the architect behind the WEF’s anti-human agenda, tracking the public 24/7 will help globalists provide them with “much better healthcare.”

Harari claims that the technology will give Big Tech companies, including Facebook and Google, access to the 24-hour flow of data.

Alarmingly, Harari also suggested that the Chinese Communist Party would “constantly monitor what’s happening” inside the bodies of the general public.

“Most people will be willing to give up their privacy in exchange for much better healthcare, based on 24-hour monitoring of what’s happening inside their bodies.”

“Very soon, people will walk around with biometric sensors—on, or even inside their bodies—and will allow Google, or Facebook, or the Chinese government, or whoever, to constantly monitor what’s happening inside [their] body.”

Harari continues by explaining that the technology could be used by dictatorship to root out those with private ill feelings or “bad emotion[s]” toward the government.

WATCH:


While Harari claims the plan is based on providing “better healthcare,” the WEF has been pushing similar plans as a way to control the public.

During the WEF’s summit in Davos, Switzerland last year, members discussed technology that reads and manipulates brainwaves.

During a presentation, globalists touted the technology’s ability to easily control and manipulate the behaviors of the workforce and general population.

The plan was unveiled by The Atlantic CEO Nicholas Thompson, and Duke University Science and Society Director Nita Farahny during the Davos summit.

The presentation by the two WEF “Agenda Contributors” features a disturbing video outlining how emerging technologies may make it possible to monitor brain activity.

Worryingly, they gloat about how such technology could be used to control the behaviors of the public.

WATCH:

The WEF’s push for fusing technology with people has become increasingly aggressive in recent months

Since the pandemic first emerged in 2020, the WEF has been ramping up calls to enslave humanity using technology.

As Slay News reported, the WEF has recently been advancing plans for digital ID technology to be used as a tool to enforce global vaccination compliance.

The WEF is pushing for the “digital identity” system to include support for users to prove their “vaccination status.”

As the digital ID will be required to use certain services, members of the general public could be denied access based on their vaccine history.

Specifically, the WEF wants people to prove that they’ve received certain vaccines before they can access the so-called metaverse.

The metaverse is an emerging virtual reality version of the Internet where people can “live,” work, buy items, “meet with friends,” and access social media.

It is widely regarded as the next evolution of the Internet.

However, globalist elites are scrambling to find ways to control the technology before the public fully adopts it.

One key suggestion is to make digital ID a requirement.

As Slay News has reported, globalists such as the United Nations (UN), WEF, European Union (EU), World Bank, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are aggressively pushing for humanity to be tied down with digital IDs.

Gates, who is leading the push for the technology, which he has been testing on third-world nations, recently called for “health records” and “payments” to be incorporated into plans for digital IDs.

At the WEF’s annual meeting in January, digital ID was proposed as a means of tracking the unvaccinated.

Queen Máxima of the Netherlands has called on globalist elites at the WEF’s Davos summit to expand plans for global “digital IDs” to ensure they can track individuals’ “vaccination status” and other private information.


Follow the Link for the Article... WEF Calls for '24-Hour Monitoring' of the Public

And,

Tuesday 23 April 2024

Bill Gates Unveils Plan to Fight 'Climate Change' by Targeting Food Supply




Billionaire Bill Gates has unveiled his latest plan to wage war on the food supply as part of an alleged effort to “fight climate change.”

The Microsoft co-founder is specifically setting his sights on meat consumption among the general public.

According to Gates and his globalist “green agenda” allies, beef cattle herds are “destroying the planet” due to their alleged “emissions.”

Gates argues that the only solution to stop the claimed impact of cattle on “global warming” is to either “modify” cows or eliminate them.

In a recent episode of his podcast “Unconfuse Me With Bill Gates,” the host unveiled his plans for using artificial intelligence (AI) to target the food supply.

Gates said he believes that AI would have a clear role to play in fighting “climate change.”

Regarding the food supply, Gates revealed that AI will be able to develop a solution to solve the “problem” of meat consumption.

He revealed plans to use AI to genetically modify cows to produce less methane.

According to Gates and other globalist groups such as the United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF), methane from cows is one of the main contributors to the so-called “climate crisis.”

However, Gates revealed that the long-term plan is to use AI to eliminate cows altogether by developing a way to manufacture “meat without the cow.”

Gates laid out his plans while speaking to Hannah Ritchie, a data scientist and researcher at the University of Oxford, UK.

He expressed his astonishment at the speed of AI advancement.

“I was very stunned how the AIs went from basically not being able to read or write at all, to doing that in a very facile way.”

Ritchie sounded a less optimistic note about the future of food technology after hearing Gates’ plans, however.

She pointed to the difficulties currently faced by globalists in trying to convince the public to change their food-consumption habits by switching to plant-based diets, lab-grown “meats,” and insect-based “foods.”

In one example, a study from Australia showed that 73% of men would rather lose ten years of their lives than give up eating meat.

Manufacturers of plant-based “meats” like Beyond and Impossible continue to suffer drastic setbacks in their aim to replace traditional meat products, as sales continue to fall.

The hype behind Gates’s so-called “lab-grown meat” has also largely disappeared amid mounting concerns about the safety of the products.

A recent New York Times opinion piece called it “the revolution that died on its way to dinner.”

A series of unfavorable revelations about the companies producing lab-grown meat, such as Josh Tetrick’s GOOD Meat, also drew attention to false claims about the products’ alleged environmental benefits.

As Slay News reported, studies found that lab-grown meat is 25 times worse for the environment than traditionally farmed beef.

Meanwhile, the threat of product bans in states including Florida, has left lab-grown meat producers and advocates in an unenviable position.

Gates has been one of the key players in the war on food and has been pushing several plans to alter the food supply while pouring millions of dollars into projects to advance his agenda,

He often uses his podcast to unveil these plans while making his pitch for how they will “save the planet.”

In an episode last year, for example, he noted the difficulties of informing people about the true cost of traditional agriculture, especially livestock grazing.

“Of all the climate areas, the one that people are probably least aware of is all the fertilizer and cows, and that’s a challenge,” said Gates, America’s largest private farmland owner.

Despite these difficulties, Gates expressed his hope that his plans will help fight “global warming.”

“Something told me plant-based is going to be the future… and I want to be the person that plants the seed,” he declared.


Follow the Link for the Article... Bill Gates Unveils Plan to Fight 'Climate Change' by Targeting Food Supply

Political Manifesto Reveals Motivation of Man Who Set Himself on Fire Outside Trump's Trial




A manifesto has emerged that reveals the motivation behind the shocking incident last week when a man set himself on fire outside the New York City courthouse where President Donald Trump’s “hush money” trial was taking place.

As Slay News reported on Friday, the man took advantage of the global attention of the trial to spread his message.

The activist, Max Azzarello, shocked Americans by setting himself on fire outside Trump’s trial in front of the world’s media.

The incident was similar to the actions of a U.S. servicemember who set himself on fire outside of the White House in order to protest Israel’s war on the terrorist organization Hamas.

Azzarello later died from the severe burns he sustained but his drastic act has prompted many to look into his motivations.

As it turns out, Azzarello is an activist and writer and has a Substack page titled “The Ponzi Papers.”

On the page, he discusses the U.S. government and what he believed was an impending fascist coup that President Joe Biden is allegedly in on.

His last article was titled, “I have set myself on fire outside the Trump Trial.”

He believes that the government’s incredible power and centralized control have created the perfect circumstances for the rise of a totalitarian regime.

Many initially assumed that Azzarello was yet another unhinged activist much like the last activist who self-immolated to make a political point.

However, Azzarello’s writings contain ideas that the average American may find pressing and relevant.

One paragraph from his substack read, “Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry.

“They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and a handful of people take all the money.”

These are the same ideas that many conservatives have been sounding the alarm about for years.

The power that the federal government holds is immense and ideological actors have already abused that power to push a totalitarian agenda.

Americans have watched the deep state and the elite abuse their rights for years and there is no sign of things getting better.

Trump’s trial is a great example of the weaponization of the government by political actors that Azzarello wrote about.

No doubt, Azzarello chose to carry out his act of protest in close proximity to Trump’s trial to call attention to what is happening.

It’s clear Azzarello had become irrational and delusional leading up to his death.

At one point in his manifesto, he claims that Trump and Biden are working together on a “fascist coup.”

Nevertheless, he appeared to have the same fears that many Americans hold.

The merits of Azzarello’s ideas can be debated endlessly but one thing is clear; political mania and despair are on the rise and it will only get worse.

The 2024 presidential election is months away and the polarization and vitriol will only get worse from here.

Trump’s resurgence and domination of President Biden on the campaign trail has made Democrats desperate and their predictions of doom and disaster are only feeding hysteria.

Things could get very ugly and the nation will be more divided than ever thanks to the Democrats and the system that they prop up.



And,

Prospective 'Hush Money' Juror Claimed to Be Unbiased, Admits Trump Makes Her 'Angry'




A prospective juror who had told the court she was unbiased in President Donald Trump’s so-called “hush money” trial.

However, that same juror has just admitted during a recent interview that she is actually “not a fan” of Trump.

Alarmingly, the juror then started listing various reasons why Trump makes her “angry.”

She then continued by blasting Trump’s handling of the pandemic and his views on China and abortion.

Worryingly, the juror wasn’t dismissed over her obvious bias.

Instead, she was reportedly only dismissed because of scheduling conflicts with the case.

After the juror was dismissed, she gave an interview to press outside.

One of the reporters asked her to explain how she felt about the 45th president.

That’s when the prospective juror stated that she was “not a fan.”

“During COVID-19 I live with someone who is immunocompromised, and I think his handling of COVID-19 was abysmal,” she said without providing any further details.

She also claimed that she has an adopted sister from China who feels “very anxious” about the comments that Trump has made about China.

“It made her very anxious and therefore made me angry,” she said.

She then added that she disagrees with Trump’s perspectives on “women and reproductive health.”

“And I think that all of that needs to be addressed,” she said.

It might just take a miracle to ensure that Trump gets a fair trial in New York.

“This prospective Trump juror was dismissed because of scheduling conflicts but told the court she could remain unbiased,” said conservative Charlie Kirk.

“Here she admits she’s ‘not a fan’ of the President.

“If Trump gets a fair trial in New York it will require a not insignificant miracle.”

WATCH:

It’s going to be very tough for President Trump to get a fair trial.

However, that was probably the goal of the people attacking him all along.

America’s globalist elites going after Trump clearly have no interest in truth, honesty, and justice.

They see Trump as an obstacle between them and their goals.

Every day that these sham trials continue, it is becoming more obvious that they’re willing to do anything to stack the deck against Trump’s quest to take back the White House.



And,

Biden Admin Accused of Destroying Evidence in Case That Could Impact Trump




Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration has been hit with a lawsuit that accuses federal officials of destroying evidence.

A nonprofit legal organization filed a lawsuit against the Biden admin on Wednesday.

The lawsuit alleges that the Biden admin deleted federal employees’ emails in violation of existing statutes.

The case could have a significant impact on President Donald Trump who is being persecuted by allegations from federal agencies that he allegedly mishandled records.

The feds routinely have been destroying public records that are supposed to be preserved.

However, no one is ever prosecuted except Trump, according to the new lawsuit.

“You have maybe tens of thousands of government records every year that are destroyed without authority,” explained Dan Epstein, an official with the America First Legal team that sued.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, he continued:

“But when it comes to Donald Trump, he gets prosecuted.

“Everyone else who doesn’t have to stand for election gets a free pass.”

The lawsuit takes aim at Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

The suit also names Biden’s HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra.

The charge is that the government routinely deletes federal employees’ emails in violation of the law.

The complaint explains federal law requires agencies to “make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities.”

The complaint, in U.S. District Court in Washington, charges that the government is in violation of its own Federal Records Act.

“If the National Archives decides not to use the legal authorities it has regarding federal records, it certainly shouldn’t make up legal authority that it doesn’t have when it comes to presidential records,” Epstein explained.

“We expect our government to act in a transparent and accountable way and exercise equanimity when it decides to investigate certain allegations.

“We clearly haven’t seen that in this case.”

The implications of the case, as its evidence unfolds, could be dramatic for Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Smith accuses Trump of violating the law for having his presidential papers, including classified material he had the authority to declassify, in his home, just as other presidents have done.

Additionally, Biden was also confirmed to have willfully taken classified papers from his vice presidency.

However, Biden did not hold authority to declassify those documents.

He stored them in his home, office, and even unprotected garage.

The special counsel in Biden’s case recommended against charging the president because of his diminished capacities.

Epstein charged that the federal government has one standard for Trump and another for everyone else.

He noted that hundreds of thousands of records are deleted annually.

The lawsuit stems from a 2023 records request from the legal team under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (DCD) references to “teacher-led indoctrination of children with radical gender ideology.”

The bureaucracy responded that records weren’t available because they were deleted 30 days after an employee leaves a position.

The NARA then said it assigns to individual workers the responsibility of deciding if records should be kept.

But that, the AFL explained, is “patently inconsistent with the law.”



And,

New York Times: Most Trump 'Hush Money' Jurors Are 'Left-of-Center'




President Donald Trump and his allies have long argued that receiving a fair jury trial in deep blue Manhattan will be nearly impossible.

Those concerns are more than speculation, however.

As reported by the New York Times’s Maggie Haberman, Trump’s jurors mostly lean “left-of-center.”

The bombshell — but unsurprising — report only served as further evidence that Trump will not receive a fair shake by a jury in Manhattan.

The case could force Trump into even more legal hurdles in the inevitable appeals process.

The jurors’ political leanings are almost purely based on math.

As Breitbart notes, Manhattan is one of the most liberal districts in the country.

Manhattan is heavily blue, and President Joe Biden won the district with 86% support in the last election.

Haberman, who is also an analyst for CNN, admitted that there’s not much in the way of neutrality on Trump’s 12-person jury.

“One thing that’s been striking during this round of voir dire is there a lot of people who, based on their answers, are more left-of-center than not, politically,” Haberman wrote.

She added, “But some seem to be trying to show they can consider alternative viewpoints, and others seem to want to show they believe in the concept of jury service as independent from personal opinions.”

Legal scholar Jonathan Turley warns that one of the greatest threats to Trump’s legal future is stealth jurors.

“Only about 12 percent of the people in this area voted for Trump,” Turley told Fox News.

“The jurors you have to worry about are the ones who are sort of ‘Trojan horse jurors,’ who are hiding bias that doesn’t appear on social media or are involved in any formal charges like the one that was just removed today.”

Several jurors had already been dismissed by week’s end.

One of them cited identity concerns, and the other juror who was let go was released for unknown reasons.

Of course, 12 jurors will be seated for the trial, and there will be a total of five alternate jurors, for a total of 18.

So far, only one alternate has been chosen, and it was reported that jury selection should be finalized by early this week.

One can bet that Trump’s lawyers are watching the jurors like a hawk to make sure they’re as unbiased as possible.

Only time will tell if they miss anything.



And,

Quad-Vaxxed Young People 318% More Likely to Die Than Unvaxxed



Alarming figures revealed in official government data expose the shocking impact on young people from the global Covid mRNA vaccination campaign.

Official data published by the UK government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that young people who have received four Covid shots are a staggering 318% more likely to die than their unvaxxed piers.

The data shows a huge spike in sudden deaths and major health complications of quad-vaxxed young people aged 18-39 years old.

An analysis of the data by The Exposé revealed that February 2023 shows the widest margin of mortality rates between the unvaccinated group and those who had received four shots.

The other months analyzed showed quad-vaxxed young people were between 221% and 290% more likely to die than those who didn’t get the shot.

The Exposé compiled the data into a chart that visually indicates how much more likely death is for the heavily vaccinated:

The data comes amid growing concerns about the safety of the shots and the long-term damage to public health that the injections have caused.

Experts and scientific studies continue to warn that the mRNS shots are responsible for the global surge in sudden deaths and deadly diseases.

Earlier this year, a peer-reviewed scientific paper published in the prestigious Cureus Journal concluded that the Covid vaccines have caused far more harm than good.

“…the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections,” the study said.

Another study found that, compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of asthma, allergies, eczema, respiratory infections, behavioral issues, and other health conditions.

Separate research showed that “for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA [COVID-19] injections.”

Another study detailed how the more vaccines an infant receives the greater the chance is that they will die.

“Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates,” the study said.

A recent analysis of data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows a shocking one million excess deaths of elderly Americans since the Covid shots were rolled out in 2021.

Meanwhile, official U.S. government data recently revealed that cancer-related deaths have soared among Covid-vaccinated people.

As Slay News reported, the latest figures published by the CDC confirm that the injections caused a staggering 14,000% increase in cancer cases in the United States up to the end of March 2024.

The data also reveals an alarming 6,113% increase in cancer cases reported among children and young adults.

The shocking spike is revealed in comparisons between the official data for Covid shots and figures for influenza vaccines.

The data shows a dramatic boost in cancers among those who received the Covid mRNA injections – something which isn’t reflected in the flu shot data.

Increasing numbers of these cancers are showing up in young people, many under age 30.

Doctors are warning that most cases are among those with no family history of cancer.

The “turbo cancers” are spreading so rapidly that seemingly healthy patients are dying within a week of being diagnosed, doctors have revealed.

Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) is now predicting millions of additional cancer cases per year.

The WHO predicts excess cancer diagnoses will continue surging until at least 2050.


Follow the Link for the Article... 

And,