Saturday, 20 January 2024

WEF Professor Warns Free Speech 'Leading to Harm' Because It's 'Legal'




Blogger Comment: A blog from October 2022, but well worth reposting and revisiting, to show the further madness in these WEF people,  a WEF 'Ivy League' professor trying to get WEF 'brownie points', stated that 'Free Speech' is leading to harm because it is legal which shows that these people are hell bent on censorship of the people (not on the excuse of protecting children et al in all truth that is the subtle lie of those in charge and who want to control everything) and even of 'free speech'...for they want to take it away from us all...and in its ultimate form, this is against our innate rights given at birth...and in the USA enshrined in the 'Constitution'...


A top Ivy League professor has warned her colleagues at the World Economic Forum (WEF) that free speech is “leading to harm” because it is currently “legal.”

Claire Wardle, a Brown University professor and member of the WEF, expressed her frustration that the First Amendment allows people to legally speak freely, even if they express views that conflict with the official narrative.

She argued during a World Economic Forum panel discussion that the lack of limitations on free speech is to blame for “misinformation” spreading online because it is not illegal.

Wardle suggested that it may be necessary to change free speech laws to prevent “low-level” or “hateful” information from being repeated.

“Well, it might be legal, but if it’s leading to harm, can’t we actually have a conversation about that?” she said to Adrian Monck, the WEF’s Head of Public and Social Engagement, who was moderating the panel.

She continued by explaining to Monck and the panel that her “fear” is that the First Amendment allows people to say things that are deemed to be “disinformation” without breaking the law or social media guidelines.

“So my fear, when it comes to your point, Adrian, is that people say: ‘Oh, the First Amendment, what kind of harm is this causing?’” Wardle explained.

“Well, what does this kind of low-level, conspiratorial, hateful, misogynistic content, that doesn’t break platform guidelines, over time, where is that leading us?

“So I just wish we could have a more nuanced conversation about speech because I worry that this idea of more speech is good speech — that’s not really the case,” Wardle said.

“And if you talk to people of color or women, their experiences on the internet look very different to probably your experience, Adrian.

“And so this idea that all speech is equal is not true.

“And I wish we could just have that conversation properly and talk about the long-term impacts of different types of speech.”

WATCH:

Wardle, a co-founder of the Information Futures Lab at Brown University’s School of Public Health, has previously argued that more must be done to censor free speech online.

She recently warned she thinks that “misinformation” has “terrifying” implications for future elections.

“When you have half the country that fundamentally does not believe that the system of democracy, that the electoral process is one that they trust — I don’t want to be a Debbie Downer — but I am really concerned around the midterms,” Wardle said on the Rhode Island Report podcast.

She added she thinks the 2024 elections will be illegitimate because of online “disinformation.”

“I think there’ll be a number of races where we just won’t have a winner,” Wardle said.

“There won’t be the infrastructure to call some races, and I don’t know where we end up.

“That’s why I think it’s a terrifying situation.”



No comments:

Post a Comment