Saturday, 30 November 2024

Biden's Education Department Targeted Christian Schools, Report Shows


Blogger Comment: Isn't it strange that all WEF associates like Biden and Harris, are trying to destroy Christianity and where Trudeau is on the record to 'criminalise' Christianity, as these WEF members do niot believe in God...only their selfish selves it appears and where according to Tucker Carlson, these WEF people think that they are 'Gods'...apparently I think that Tucker is right, when you look into these people... and you find that they are basically bought and sold on the Globalist's  stage of ultimate control...humanity in this case and the worst case of course of human control....as it is ultimate... 


President Joe Biden’s Department of Education (DOE) targeted Christian and career schools far more than others, a new report has revealed.

A new report by the American Principles Project (APP) showed that nearly 70% of fines and enforcement by the DOE were against Christian colleges.

However, less than 10% of all students attend these schools.

The report termed enforcement efforts as a “weaponization” of the DOE.

The efforts of the department were similar to how other federal agencies have targeted conservatives and other Right-leaning groups.

In a statement, APP Policy Director Jon Schweppe said:

“While major assaults from agencies like the Department of Justice have taken most of the headlines, we should not ignore similarly corrupt efforts in other agencies as well.

“As our report details, the Biden-Harris Department of Education has been engaged in a long-running scheme to punish Christian colleges that are ideologically opposed to the left’s agenda.

“The unfair targeting of these institutions has been egregious, and it needs to stop immediately,” he added.

Two of the largest and most prominent Christian universities, Liberty University and Grand Canyon University faced “larger fines than all of the past seven years combined.”

This includes the $2.4 million imposed on Penn State for the Jerry Sandusky sex crimes against students and the $4.5 million imposed on Michigan University for Larry Nassau’s crimes against gymnasts, including some Olympic contenders.

GCU is appealing a $37.7 million fine for supposedly misleading students about the cost of its doctoral programs.

In April, Department of Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said that he would shut down GCU.

He called it a “predatory” school that took advantage of first-generation college students.

According to the report, at “least 12 Christian colleges have been the target of excessive penalties or banned from receiving federal student aid; by comparison, no Ivy League school has been the recipient of punitive action by the Office of Enforcement.”

“The average fine against a Christian school for a Clery Act violation was $815,000, compared to $228,571 against public and private institutions,” it said.

Of course, the Biden administration knows that Christian and career schools are less likely to be on board with its woke agenda.

The weaponized federal government has been doing everything it can to put those schools out of commission.

GCU recently had to defend its non-profit status in court and was able to successfully do so.

The court ruled unanimously that the DOE applied an incorrect standard when denying the school non-profit status.

The Arizona Board for Private Postsecondary Education, the Internal Revenue Service, the State of Arizona, and the Higher Learning Commission all approved GCU’s non-profit status before the DOE ruled against it.



And,

Michelle Obama Declares She Has 'No Sympathy' for Melania Trump


Blogger Comment: The difference between a Republican woman and a Democrat Women cannot be any starker here in what Michelle Obama says, as apparently a Republican woman has an independent mind and where apparently, even a Democrat first lady, has to tow-the-line and think and agree with what her husband thinks and says, and where Obama states this out of her own mouth and the "public mouth" cannot lie...can it...therefore it's no wonder that Democrat husbands never get it right...now do they...better being 'NOT' under the 'thumb' I would say in my mind and independence of thought always best to get things right...I often wondered why Obama always got it wrong, but now I know...thanks Michelle for you learn something new every day...and in this respect here, from an odd source this time

Michelle Obama has lashed out at incoming First Lady Melania Trump as hate and bitterness continue to engulf the Democrats.

Obama she has “no sympathy” for Melania Trump after the future first lady revealed that she doesn’t always agree with her husband politically.

Melania recently confessed she doesn’t agree with President Donald Trump’s position regarding abortion.

However, as a Republican woman, Melania Trump is free to form and express her own opinions, a concept the Left appears to struggle with.

In a 2016 interview, Obama told Stephen Colbert that she does not feel sorry for political spouses who are not in perfect alignment with their other halves.

Obama’s remarks resurfaced after Melania Trump shared in her new memoir that she believes in a woman’s right to an abortion.

“Restricting a woman’s right to choose whether to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is the same as denying her control over her own body,” Melania wrote in her book.

“I have carried this belief with me throughout my entire adult life.”

The confession surprised many, given President Trump’s role in ending Roe v. Wade. 

Despite her differences with her husband, Melania steadfastly defended him against attacks on the campaign trail.

She blasted comparisons between her husband and Hitler.

She also blames Trump’s opponents for inciting two assassination attempts against him.

While Melania played a subdued role in support of her husband, Michelle and Barack Obama raved from the progressive, feminist hymnal in their failed bid to elect Kamala Harris.

Indeed, Michelle Obama dropped her famous pledge 

to “go high” as she called Trump a “weak man.”

Barack, meanwhile, promoted tired hoaxes and cracked jokes about Trump and diapers.

Michelle Obama explained her view that political spouses should agree 100%.

Obama added that she has “no sympathy” for Melania Trump.

“No…you know, you have to be, you know, in it,” she said.

“If you’re in it, and if you don’t agree, you should have agreed before they ran.

“Bottom line is, if you didn’t agree with what Barack was saying, I would not support his run.

“So I stand there proudly, and I hope they are, too, standing with their spouses proudly.

“So no, no sympathy,” she added.

Despite her past sentiments about political solidarity within marriages, Michelle Obama urged wives in pro-Trump households to vote for Harris in secret.

“If you are a woman who lives in a household of men that don’t listen to you or value your opinion, just remember that your vote is a private matter,” Michelle Obama said in October.

In the end, the voters rejected the divisive message the Obamas were sending and re-elected Trump with a resounding mandate.

The mass rejection has now put the Obamas’ political legacy in serious doubt.

Now, the Obamas can quietly seethe over their defeat – together.




And,

UK's Socialist Government Votes in Favor of Bill to Begin Euthanizing Citizens


Blogger Comment: The UK under Starmer, a WEF member and chose Davos (The WEF) over Westminster (UK Lower House, Parliament) and shows where his loyalty lies and where the UK are going the same way, as Canada where another WEF member and WEF Young Global Leader Trudeau has taken Canadians down the same road and in 2016 was a similar Bill to the UK's today, but since them 8 years ago it now incorporates a great lot more different people that Canada is now Euthanizing (and not people who are terminal)...including now what they call "Mature Children"...but its strange all these nations that have been bringing in these "euthanization" programs to end life over the last decade, their political leaders are all associated with the WEF...strange eh...but maybe not... 

The socialist-controlled UK government has voted in favor of the “Assisted Dying Bill” to usher in the globalist eugenics agenda by allowing doctors to begin euthanizing their patients.

British Parliament has voted in favor of the legislation which would change the national laws by permitting doctors to kill their patients.

In a 330-275 vote, the far-left Labour Party-dominated Parliament advanced the highly controversial bill to a third reading.

Supporters of the bill argue that doctors will only be able to kill patients under certain conditions, insisting that the laws would only be used to euthanize terminally ill citizens who have no other option.

However, every other nation that passed euthanasia laws started out with the same promise before rapidly descending down the slippery slope to death-on-demand.

In the UK’s far-left sister state of Canada, the government introduced its Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) laws in 2016 with the same promises.

However, today, Canadians are being euthanized for povertyhomelessnessdepressionmental illness, and even hearing loss.

Some are even campaigning for the Canadian government to begin euthanizing “mature children.”

In Canada, which has a socialist healthcare system like the UK, patients are now reporting that they are being bullied into choosing MAiD over expensive treatments.

It has led to the government being accused of euthanizing patients to relieve the burden on the system and save money.

In fact, a recent study found that the Canadian government has saved over $130 million by killing patients rather than treating them.

Now, Brits may soon be told they’re “selfish” for wanting to seek treatment rather than choosing “suicide.”

The outcome of the UK’s vote was unclear beforehand.

The bill was highly contested and faced opposition across party lines.

The vote was considered a matter of conscience, meaning that MPs were not expected to vote alongside their party’s position.

Former Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak voted for the measure whereas the new leader of the Conservative Party and Leader of the Opposition, Kemi Badenoch, voted against it.

The Bill, first introduced by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, allows adults who are estimated to have less than six months to live the option to kill themselves with the help of doctors.

According to the proposed legislation, two doctors and one judge need to approve each case.

Canada, Belgium, and the Netherlands all started out this way too.

The bill will now move on to a third reading which is the committee and report stages.

During these stages, it will be further scrutinized by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

The bill, with any possible amendments added during this stage, will then be voted on again by Parliament.

This process will not begin before April 2025.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting from the governing far-left Labour Party said beforehand that he would vote against the bill.

Streeting argues that the UK’s end-of-life care was not formidable enough to support it.

According to the parliamentary record, socialist Prime Minister Keir Starmer, a World Economic Forum (WEF) member, voted in favor of the bill.

However, not all members of Starmer’s Labour Party supported his globalist eugenics agenda.

Labour MP Florence Eshalomi also gave an impassioned speech against the proposed legislation.

In an emotional statement before fellow MPs, Eshalomi said:

“Put simply, Madam Deputy Speaker, we should be helping people to live comfortable, pain-free lives on their own terms before we think about making it easier for them to die.”

WATCH:




And,

Forensic Pathologist Sounds Alarm as Investigation Proves Covid 'Vaccines' Behind Spike in Sudden Seizure Deaths

 


One of America’s leading forensic pathologists has issued a red alert after proving that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are behind recent spikes in violent sudden seizure deaths.

An investigation into the fatal seizures was led by forensic pathologist Dr. Joseph A. Prahlow.

Prahlow is a Professor of Pathology at St. Louis University School of Medicine and the Assistant Medical Examiner at the City of St. Louis’s Office of the Medical Examiner.

The renowned expert is now raising the alarm after discovering that once-rare seizures are a terrifying adverse effect of Covid mRNA injection.

Prahlow revealed that he investigated cases where no alternative cause could be identified, proving, without doubt, that the “vaccines” caused the fatal seizure spike.

The findings were published in the peer-reviewed journal Academic Forensic Pathology.

Prahlow’s paper presents two cases of new-onset seizures resulting in death shortly after vaccination as supporting evidence.

However, Prahlow warns that many other cases of sudden fatal seizures haven’t been investigated, meaning global spikes in such deaths are also likely linked to the mass Covid vaccination campaign.

The cases presented in the paper raise important questions about causality, clinical management, and death certification.

This thorough case analysis involves the meticulous examination of two cases, detailing the clinical history, diagnostic work-ups, and forensic findings.

The methodical approach used during the investigation ensures that potential contributing factors are explored comprehensively.

However, similar deaths are not normally investigated so thoroughly so the actual causes are not usually identified.

During his investigations, Prahlow identified a direct connection between Covid mRNA vaccination and sudden seizure mortality.

When determining the plausibility of vaccine-induced seizures, Prahlow’s paper highlights the established frameworks, such as the World Health Organization’s (WHO) causality assessment criteria and Brighton Collaborative Criteria.

The paper also identifies other neurological adverse events associated with “vaccines,” such as encephalitis and stroke.

These broader neurological effects could provide additional insights into the mechanisms of vaccine-induced seizures.

This study contributes meaningfully to the discussion on vaccine safety by shedding light on rarely-discussed adverse events like seizure-related deaths.

While it highlights areas for improvement in clinical and forensic practice, it also emphasizes the need for balanced, evidence-based approaches that prioritize both individual and public health considerations.

Further research and stronger surveillance systems are essential to better understand and mitigate such risks.

Dr. Prahlow effectively links vaccination to mortality, emphasizing the importance of considering vaccines as potential contributors when no other explanation is evident.

This highlights the need for diligence in vaccine-related adverse event investigations.

The paper concludes by stressing the importance of informed consent, especially given the “fast-tracked” nature of COVID-19 vaccines.

Patients must be made aware of all potential risks, even rare ones, to make truly informed decisions.

This is not the first study to link Covid mRNA “vaccines” to deadly seizures, however.

As Slay News previously reported, a peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious Cureus Journal earlier this year analyzed the death of a man who was killed by seizures within 40 hours of receiving a Covid mRNA injection.

The researchers documented the case of the 73-year-old man who had received a Pfizer mRNA Covid shot.

He developed a headache that was followed by violent seizures, loss of consciousness, and finally death.

The case is a cause for concern as the man was killed in under two days after being injected, the researchers note.

The study, conducted by world-renowned Japanese scientists Shimura M, Fujikawa H, Yazawa M, et al., is titled “An Autopsy Case of Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome After a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccination.”

The scientific study determined that a form of brain damage can occur rapidly after a person is injected with a Covid mRNA shot.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed last year that a safety signal has been detected that suggests Covid mRNA shots may be linked to a spike in seizures among toddlers following vaccination.

As Slay News reported, researchers with the FDA and three large healthcare companies revealed the findings in a new preprint study.

The study shows that seizures/convulsions “met the statistical threshold for a signal” in children aged 2 to 4 following receipt of a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

The same safety signal was also detected among children aged 2 to 5 following receipt of a Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.



And,

Friday, 29 November 2024

Canadians Fear Government Is Targeting Poor Citizens with Euthanasia


Canadians are raising concerns that they fear their government is using the country’s liberal “assisted suicide” laws to relieve the “burden” of poor people by euthanizing them.

A new poll has revealed that most Canadian citizens believe the government is targeting poor and socially vulnerable people with euthanasia.

Alarmingly, however, most respondents to the poll also said they still support the practice in general, despite their fears that it’s being abused.

The poll was conducted by Angus Reid and released on November 21.

It shows that 62 percent of Canadians “worry” that the government’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program prays on “financially or socially vulnerable people.” 

Yet, the poll also found that 63 percent of respondents said they support Canada’s current euthanasia laws.  

The poll was gathered from the responses of 468 people.

The respondents included people who work in the healthcare setting.

The survey found that 24 percent of Canadians have some “level of personal experience with MAiD.”

The “personal experience” was classed as knowing a friend or family member who has been euthanized by the government.

The results from the poll also found that 6 percent of respondents knew someone who had been pressured into signing up for MAiD without asking for it.

Of those 6 percent, 37 percent said the person offered MAiD accepted it and was killed by euthanasia. 

The poll also found that about 4 in 10 healthcare workers said that Canadians with disabilities have slower experiences in getting proper healthcare, as well as a lower quality of care in general.  

Overall, 45 percent of respondents said they think those living with disabilities get poor healthcare service in their province.  

In a blog post about the poll, Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition noted that it has “received many phone calls from people who were upset that healthcare professionals (often a hospital MAiD team) had asked them or a loved one if they wanted euthanasia.” 

“One person contacted me after being asked 5 times if they wanted euthanasia,” he wrote.  

MAiD was first introduced to offer terminally ill patients the option to die on their own terms and avoid a slow painful death.

However, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government sought to expand the laws to align with a radical eugenics agenda.

The laws have slowly been expanded to allow government doctors to euthanize citizens for poverty and homelessness, depression, mental illness, autism, and even hearing loss.

As Slay News recently reported, the government has now even begun euthanizing citizens with Covid “vaccine” injuries.

Last month, Canada killed the first citizen under the controversial new plans.

An Ontario man in his late 40s was the first person to be euthanized for “post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome.”

The man was killed under Canada’s MAiD program.

Doctors had determined that the patient had become a burden on the socialized healthcare system.

They warned that he wouldn’t recover from “post-vaccine syndrome” and ruled that MAiD was a better option than long-term care.

The patient, identified only as “Mr. A,” had experienced “suffering and functional decline” following three Covid mRNA vaccinations.

The number of Canadians killed by lethal injection under the nation’s MAiD program since 2016 stands at close to 65,000.

An estimated 16,000 of those deaths happened in 2023 alone.

Many fear that because the official statistics are manipulated the number may be even higher.

Meanwhile, the socialist-controlled UK could soon join Canada on the slippery “euthanasia” slope as the government debates passing a new “assisted dying bill.”



And,

Elon Musk Raises Alarm over America's Massive National Debt


Incoming Trump administration official Elon Musk is raising the alarm about America’s staggering national debt.

Musk said he’s concerned that many people are unaware of America’s gargantuan, ever-expanding national debt.

“A significant % of people don’t even know that there is such a thing as a national debt!” Musk declared in a post on X.

“Those that do often don’t know how big it is or that our interest payments now exceed what we spend on our military,” he added.

“Only a small % understand that government overspending causes inflation.”

The national debt has soared past $36 trillion.

“America is going bankrupt fast,” Musk warned in another post.

“The excess government spending is what causes inflation!” he asserted in a post from earlier this month.

“ALL government spending is taxation.

“This is a very important concept to appreciate.

“It is either direct taxation, like income tax, or indirect via inflation due to increasing the money supply.”

In another post, Musk warned:

“If we don’t tackle the national debt, all tax revenue will go to paying interest and there will be nothing left for anything else.”

In a post from earlier this year, Musk warned that “the dollar will be worth nothing” if the issue isn’t addressed.

President Donald Trump tapped Musk and former GOP presidential primary candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to helm the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

DOGA will be tasked with gutting federal bureaucracy and rooting out government waste.

In a statement, Trump said:

DOGE “will provide advice and guidance from outside of Government, and will partner with the White House and Office of Management & Budget to drive large scale structural reform, and create an entrepreneurial approach to Government never seen before.”

Musk and Ramaswamy spoke about their plans for DOGE in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece.

They noted that they will work “as outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees.”

Musk also weighed in on government waste in a recent interview with Tucker Carlson.

He argued that Big Government has gone unchecked for so long it’s just been accepted.

WATCH: Click on the 'text at the top of the video block to view...


Follow the Link for the Article... Elon Musk Raises Alarm over America's Massive National Debt


And,

Republicans Raise Concerns about Balance of Power as Mike Walz Quits Congress to Join Trump Team


Republican Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL) has just resigned from Congress after being tapped to serve as incoming President Donald Trump’s national security adviser.

However, some Republicans are raising concerns about how this could impact the balance of the House of Representatives, The Hill reported.

Waltz’s resignation takes effect when Trump takes the oath of office on January 20, 2025.

This ensures Waltz can vote for Speaker of the House on January 3.

However, this news also comes on the heels of fellow Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz’s (R-FL) resignation last week.

Gaetz was initially picked to be Trump’s attorney general and resigned from Congress with immediate effect.

He then withdrew his name from consideration, despite already resigning from Congress.

Gaetz later confirmed that he would not be returning to his seat in the new Congress in January.

Even before these registrations, Republicans had a narrow majority to pass Trump’s agenda.

Now, they will have to wait until April 1, when special elections will be held to elect replacements for the outgoing representatives.

On Monday, Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd accepted Waltz’s resignation.

Byrd said the primary election would occur on Jan. 28, with the general election commencing on April 1 to fill the vacancies.

Unlike other cabinet positions, the national security adviser role goes into effect as soon a candidate accepts the role rather than requiring Senate confirmation.

Other Republican members of Congress tapped to staff Trump’s cabinet include Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR), who lost her reelection, and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY).

According to Fox News, Trump has already begun endorsing some candidates for their replacements.

In Florida, Trump presented the state’s chief financial officer, Jimmy Patronis Jr., and former state Sen. Randy Fine as possible candidates.

So far, Trump’s cabinet picks have been popular with Americans, the New York Post reported.

Popular choices have included Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the Health and Human Services Secretary and Fox News host Pete Hegseth for Defense Secretary.

Surveys show that his new cabinet is well received.

There is considerable optimism for Trump when he takes the White House along with the people he’s handpicked to help.

However, he may run into a snag with the vacancies in Congress from those who will leave to join his administration.

Fox News noted that Republicans have 219 seats compared to Democrats’ 213 seats in Congress.

The majority could be in jeopardy with the departure of Gaetz, Stefanik, and Waltz.

Even in heavily Republican districts, the success of Republican candidates is not guaranteed, which is making some nervous.

House Majority Leader Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) said:

“I know he’s already pulled a few really talented people out of the House – hopefully, no more for a little while until special elections come up, but it shows you the talent that we have and the ability we have.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) similarly implored Trump to quit pulling talent from their ranks.

“President Trump fully understands and appreciates the math here, and it’s just a numbers game,” Johnson said.

“You know, we believe we’re going to have a larger majority than we had last time.

“It’s too early to handicap it, but we are optimistic about that.

“But every single vote will count, because if someone gets ill or has a car accident or a late flight on their plane, then it affects the votes on the floor.

“So, I think he and the administration are well attuned to that,” Johnson said.

“I don’t expect that we will have more members leaving, but I’ll leave that up to him.”

There’s a delicate balance between getting the best of the best in Trump’s cabinet and leaving some solid Republicans in place.

Trump will strike that balance as best he can, but the nation’s future is looking bright with him at the helm no matter what.



And,