Tuesday, 3 December 2024

CDC Epidemiologists Admit Covid 'Vaccines' Are Harmful to Young Children



Top epidemiological researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have admitted that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are harmful to young children and unborn babies.

The CDC officials conducted a study, published in the peer-reviewed JAMA Network Open, to investigate mounting reports of adverse post-vaccination reactions to the injections among toddlers.

The study analyzed a total of 5,644 children aged 6–24 months who received at least one dose of a Covid mRNA “vaccine,” from either Pfizer or Moderna.

The group also included children of mothers who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” during or shortly before their pregnancy.

The researchers focused on local and systemic reactions reported by participants of the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry (C19VPR).

However, they note that the study didn’t include reports of any deaths linked to the “vaccines.”

The researcher asserts that the study aimed to provide insights into vaccine safety for this age group, informing parental decisions and healthcare recommendations.

Data for the participants was data collected from November 2022 to September 2023.

The key variables represented in the study sample include vaccine manufacturer, dose, coadministration with other vaccines, and reaction severity.

The study found that overall reactions raised some issues.

Overall, a staggering 46.7% of all children in the study group reported post-vaccination reactions.

While many of these reactions were listed as mild to moderate, the high rate is a major cause for concern.

As far as adverse reactions, common symptoms included irritability or fussiness (30.1%), local reactions (21.1%), and fever (13.8%).

Life-threatening reactions were reported in 0.3% of cases.

While 0.3% may sound like an insignificant number, it accounts for 3000 children in every 1 million vaccinated.

In total, 87 of 5644 children (1.5%) were hospitalized due to a severe reaction to the injection.

This figure becomes deeply concerning when you consider that 1.5% is 15,000 children in every 1 million vaccinated.

Six participants reported a seizure or febrile seizure after receiving COVID-19 vaccination.

Deaths were not investigated by the study.

The researchers found that Moderna’s mRNA injection had a slightly higher prevalence of reactions compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech shot.

Reactions were more common after the first dose than subsequent doses for both vaccines.

The study also found receiving a Covid shot alongside another vaccine increased the likelihood of reactions.

A serious adverse event rate necessitating medical treatment in 1.5% of cases can add up to a lot of cases if the vaccination population is pervasive.

When the total number of children who received the “vaccines” is taken into consideration, 1.5% is a very large number.

Notably, unlike other studies reporting higher reactions after the second dose, this cohort observed more reactions after the first dose.

The findings align with existing clinical trial data, reinforcing the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in young children.

Unsurprisingly, the CDC researchers insist that the results of the study provide reassuring evidence of the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in young children.

Focusing on the seemingly small percentage number, they note that mild or moderate reactions were the most common and severe events were “low.”

The news comes amid growing evidence regarding the harm to pregnant mothers and children caused by the “vaccines.”

As Slay News reported last week, newly emerged data has revealed an alarming surge in major birth abnormalities among mothers who have received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The shocking discovery was revealed in Pfizer’s own pregnancy trial data.

Pfizer recently updated the results of their randomized clinical trial of the Covid injections on pregnant women.

The clinical trial, ID NCT04754594, is entitled: “To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Against COVID-19 in Healthy Pregnant Women 18 Years of Age and Older.”

The results from the trial were analyzed by MIT computer scientist and data expert Steve Kirsch.

Kirsch, the inventor of the optical computer mouse, is the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF).

After breaking down the clinical trial results, Kirsch made a chilling discovery.

Kirsch found that mothers who received a Covid mRNA “vaccine,” before or during their pregnancy, were over four times more likely to give birth to a baby with major congenital abnormalities.

The data reveals that “vaccinated” mothers had a stunning 4.2X higher rate of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) when compared to unvaxxed moms.



And,

Biden Blocks New Mining in Key Region Producing 40% of America's Coal Supply




Lame-duck President Joe Biden’s administration has announced that a key coal-producing region has been blocked from conducting any new mining in order to comply with the globalist green agenda.

The mining block impacts a region producing nearly half of America’s coal supply.

In a statement, the Biden admin says the black was enforced due to “climate” concerns.

However, it could be short-lived as President Donald Trump prepares to make U.S. energy dominance a key focus of his incoming administration.

Biden’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) recently approved an amendment to the Resource Management Plan (RMP) to ban new federal coal leases.

According to Todd D. Yeager, BLM Buffalo field manager, the move seeks to make “48.12 billion short tons of coal unavailable for leasing consideration in order to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a proxy for climate change.”

The decision will block any new federal mining leases in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin, the country’s largest coal-producing region, by 2041.

This region produces about 40% of the nation’s coal.

BLM, however, will allow for existing coal leases to still be developed.

In a statement regarding the decision, Trump’s transition team reinforced the idea of the president-elect’s campaign promise to bolster American-made energy.

Trump-Vance Transition spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in the statement:

“Families have suffered under the past four years’ war on American energy, which prompted the worst inflation crisis in a generation. Voters re-elected President Trump by a resounding margin giving him a mandate to implement the promises he made on the campaign trail, including lowering energy costs for consumers.”

Leavitt added that when Trump takes office, he “will make America energy dominant again, protect our energy jobs, and bring down the cost of living for working families.”

The Powder River Basin lease ban, which covers parts of southeast Montana and northeast Wyoming, includes making more than 1.7 million acres unavailable for coal leasing within the Miles City Field Office planning area.

The BLM memo claimed that the “U.S. energy market is moving away from coal to lower-priced natural gas and renewable energy sources.”

However, the affected state representatives say the region is a vital natural energy resource.

The decision was widely criticized by Montana and Wyoming elected officials, including Sen. Steve Daines (R–MT).

Daines said he would be introducing legislation in an attempt to reverse the decision.

In a statement following the decision, Daines said:

“At every turn, the Biden administration has launched attack after attack on made-in-Montana energy, and the people of Montana and the rest of the country rebuked the administration for it at the ballot box.

“Eastern Montana is rich in coal and mining operations and the jobs and coal produced in the Powder River Basin help support our national security, bolster our energy grid, and create high-paying jobs.”

Republican Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte said in a statement:

“Once again, the Biden-Harris administration is ignoring states and crippling our energy supply.

“While Montana supports an ‘all-of-the-above’ energy strategy, the White House is picking winners and losers on the president’s way out the door.

“Simply put, this rule will destroy coal jobs and defund public education in Montana. It’s a disaster.”

Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) said in a statement.

“After the American people issued a stunning rebuke to President Biden, he continues to punish Wyoming communities.

“I will work with President Trump and his team to reverse this and other midnight regulations.”

The BLM memo said the administration is blocking coal leasing to support Biden’s target of complying with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” goals for greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

The memo suggests that “the U.S. energy market is moving away from coal to lower-priced natural gas and renewable energy sources.”

Earth Justice, an environmental justice group, also claimed the mining bans stemmed from an evolving approach to energy production.

In an Earth Justice press release after Biden announced his initial plans in May, Paula Antoine, Western Organization of Resource Councils board chair, said:

“Coal has powered our nation for many decades, but technology, economics, and markets are changing radically. BLM’s announcement recognizes that coal’s era is ending, and it’s time to focus on supporting our communities through the transition away from coal, investing in workers, and moving to heal our lands, waters, and climate as we enter a bright clean energy future.”



And,

Liberal Women Begin Sterilizing Themselves to Protest Trump's Election Win


Liberal women are reportedly sterilizing themselves in response to President Donald Trump’s historic election victory and return to the White House.

According to a report from Newsweek, anti-Trump women are undergoing the procedure to supposedly protest in support of women’s “reproductive rights.”

The outlet spoke to five women who said they had themselves sterilized themselves because of fears about women’s rights under another Trump administration.

However, President Trump has never promoted policies that hurt women’s rights.

In fact, he campaigned in support of women’s rights during the 2024 election.

Additionally, Trump didn’t take any action during his first four years in office to suggest he has an anti-women agenda.

“If I am to be denied any rights in the next four (or more) years, I will not give them up without a fight,” a liberal woman from Texas told the outlet.

Another woman said, “I am not happy that I felt forced into a surgery I did not want to alter my body, I feel like the election tied my hands and forced me to be sterilized—that is horrible.”

She didn’t explain why she had been “forced” into the procedure, however.

The husband of one of the women interviewed by the outlet had already had a vasectomy.

As Newsweek notes, abortion and reproductive rights were a major issue during the recent election.

Trump took credit for the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.

The ruling removed the Constitutional right to abortion, sending the decision back to the states.

However, the president-elect has made it clear that he does not support a federal abortion ban.

He has long asserted that abortion access should be decided by the states and not the federal government.

The suggestion that Trump is trying to ban abortion is a fabrication by the Democrats and their fearmongering allies in the corporate media.

It’s unclear at present exactly how many women have chosen to undergo sterilization procedures as a result of Trump’s victory.

In the immediate aftermath of the Dobbs decision, which repealed Roe v. Wade, there was a significant uptick in sterilizations among both sexes.

The increase in the number of female procedures was almost double the increase in male procedures.

However, the increase among men was still huge.

The spike can only be explained as a response to the Supreme Court’s decision.

Daily web searches for “Where can I get a vasectomy?” surged when the draft Dobbs decision was released in May 2022.

The searches increased by 850%, according to The Guardian.



And,

Monday, 2 December 2024

Joe Biden Pardoned Son Hunter to Save Himself, White House Insider Reveals




Following the bombshell news that lame-duck President Joe Biden has given his son Hunter a blanket pardon for all crimes, details are beginning to emerge regarding the motivations behind the move.

Allegations are now surfacing that President Biden has pardoned his son to save himself from damaging information being made public.

A White House official has reportedly claimed that Hunter Biden threatened his own father to pressure him into issuing the pardon.

Before he ended his presidential campaign, Biden insisted that he would not pardon his son for federal tax and gun crimes.

Even after he dropped out of the race, the president insisted that he let justice prevail.

WATCH:


However, pardoning Hunter Biden would have been incredibly damaging for any Democrat running for election as it would have cemented concerns about the two-tiered justice system.

It’s like the president was always planning to pardon his son once the election was passed.

Now, under a month since Election Day, Biden has pardoned his son, confirming that the Democrats believe justice should not apply to those in power.

Biden announced the pardon in a Sunday night statement.

“There has been an effort to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution,” Biden wrote in a statement.

“In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me – and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here.

“Enough is enough,” he added.


As soon as the news was announced, however, speculation raged as to what made Biden change his mind.

According to Jack Posobiec, a White House insider has alleged that Hunter Biden forced his father to issue a pardon by giving him an ultimatum.

“Over Thanksgiving, Hunter told his father about a book he was writing that would go public with everything,” claimed Posobiec

“Days later, his father signed a blanket pardon – per WH official.”

As many have pointed out, the pardon is sweeping.

The blanket pardon protects Hunter Biden from prosecution for all crimes, even those he hasn’t been accused of, yet.


Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani also believes Biden issued the pardon to protect himself.

Giuliani suggests that Hunter Biden’s role in his father’s shady Ukraine deals was the main reason for the pardon.

“Biden, who will not even meet with his grand daughter Navy, didn’t pardon his son because he’s a good father,” Giuliani said in a post on X.

“He did so because, as his son admits on the Hard Drive, for 30 years Hunter has given half the millions he’s collected to the Boss of the Crime Family- Joe Biden.”

“I think it’s becoming pretty clear now… this pardon was for Joe…. Not Hunter,” Juanita Broaddrick added.

Others are pointing to the timing of the pardon announcement.

“I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that Joe Biden frantically decides to give Hunter the largest pardon in HISTORY to erase ELEVEN YEARS of federal crimes — less than 24 hrs after Kash Patel is announced as FBI Director,” noted Benny Johnson.

Biden has asserted that “No one is above the law” as recently as May 31st.

He made the reference to President Donald Trump being convicted.

The comment has not aged well.

Meanwhile, Trump has blasted the move as “an abuse and miscarriage of justice.”

The president-elect is demanding to know why Jan. 6 defendants will continue to be pursued and languish in jail despite being accused of crimes far less serious than Hunter Biden.




And,

And,

Biden Under Obama and with Obama and US Under-Secretary Nuland, were the genesis of the Ukraine War in 2014 when Biden got Ukraine chief public prosecutor fired, as it was a behind closed doors condition for US money to be released to Ukraine, as he was taking to task the corrupt organization that Hunter Biden and other Democrats were involved with, as Obama voted in the 2014 UN Vote to keep Nazism, as  they knew that the Ukraine was really run by Neo-Nazis as they still are today...and Americans if they knew this, would not fund the corrupt Ukraine regime...and where all that was kept away from them...

"Reposted from 2015 due to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict - Obama and Biden as Vice-President with their Administration Voted for Nazism to Exist in the United Nations Resolution on Banning it Globally (unbelievable but perfectly true according to the UN Vote in November 2014) - What is the Modern World of Politics coming too When the Most Insidious Political Ideology and Regime Ever Invented that Murdered tens of Millions world-wide, is Allowed to Exist and Flourish - But Obama Wanted it That Way"

Major Car Manufacturer Nissan on ‘Brink of Collapse,’ Thousands of Jobs at Risk


Car manufacturing giant Nissan is reportedly “on the brink of collapse,” putting thousands of American jobs at risk.

The automaker may now only have 12 months to survive, it has been warned.

The Japanese auto firm that employs 17,000 people in the US, and tens of thousands more around the world, has embarked on a huge cost-cutting program.

It comes after the company has been suffering heavy losses.

Last month, Nissan said it would axe 9,000 jobs and 20 percent of its global manufacturing capacity.

The cuts come as the company scrambles to reduce costs by $ 2.6 billion in the current fiscal year amid a sales slump in China and the US, its two biggest markets.

Nissan CEO Makoto Uchida is taking a 50 percent pay cut and it has now been reported that chief financial officer Stephen Ma is stepping down.

However, insiders fear the moves could not be enough as Nissan struggles to stay competitive with rivals.

Many of Nissan’s rivals have pushed ahead more successfully with popular hybrid cars.

The warnings come as a strategic deal signed with competitors Mitsubishi and Renault back in 1999, covering European, Japanese, and US markets, could be ending.

Two anonymous “senior officials” at Nissan have been quoted by the Financial Times as saying that Renault is now looking at reducing its financial stake in Nissan.

That could leave Nissan requiring cash backing from the Japanese or US governments over the next year.

The company would need such investments to remain in business, according to the report.

The company risks running up its largest-ever debt by 2026.

Nissan could potentially end up owing as much as $5.6 billion, it is suggested.

The firm’s worldwide sales slumped by 3.8 percent to 1.59 million vehicles in the first half of the current financial year, largely driven by a 14.3 percent fall in China.

The FT quoted a “senior official” at Nissan as saying:

“We have 12 or 14 months to survive.

“This is going to be tough.

“And in the end, we need Japan and the US to be generating cash.”

Early last month, Nissan’s head of manufacturing Hideyuki Sakamoto told a news conference:

“Globally, we currently have 25 vehicle production lines.

“Our current plan is to reduce the operational maximum capacity of these 25 lines by 20 percent.

“One specific method for this is to change the line speed and shift patterns, thereby increasing the efficiency of operational personnel.”

And CEO Uchida told reporters:

“This has been a lesson learned and we have not been able to keep up with the times.

“We weren’t able to foresee that hybrid electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids would be so popular.”

There have been suggestions that Nissan could strengthen ties with Japan’s second-largest carmaker Honda.

Honda could buy a stake in the smaller firm.

However, sources were quoted describing such a deal as a “last resort.”

Toyota is the largest automaker in both Japan and the world.

The company is responsible for about 10 million vehicles each year – compared to Nissan’s 3.4 million.




And,

Schools Can Force-Vaccinate Children Against Parents' Wishes, State Supreme Court Rules


Blogger Comment: Strange that it is always the Democrat Controlled US States that does this, even though the Governor is a Republic, but he has got his hands tied because the Democrats control the process and apparently in line with their thinking...the judiciary...thank GOD that Trump has arrived again to put the wrongs right...even for Democrat voters I would say...as I don't think that they also would like vaccines forced on their children, unless that is of course if they  were absolute morons...?


The Vermont Supreme Court has ruled that schools can force-vaccinate children for Covid against the wishes of their parents.

The high court ruled on a case involving a 6-year-old boy who was forced to take a Covid mRNA injection by his school.

However, his family had explicitly stated that they didn’t want their child to receive the “vaccines.”

The school was aware that the parents didn’t want their young son vaccinated but decided to give him the injection anyway.

The family responded by suing the school and the district, with the case going to the state Supreme Court.

However, in a landmark ruling, the high court agreed with the school, greenlighting forced vaccinations of children across the state.

Attorney John Klar has warned that the precedent set by the case “threatens every child in America.”

Klar comments on the case in an article for the Federalist.

The young boy was “vaccinated with an experimental COVID-19 intervention against the family’s wishes, and now the Vermont Supreme Court has endorsed the actions by the state actors,” Klar reported.

“The Vermont court had ruled that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) prohibits such claims, granting immunity to school and government personnel when they mandate vaccinations,” he explained.

Following the ruling in Vermont, the case now is being forwarded to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“Stunningly, the Vermont Supreme Court did not even pay lip service to the constitutional liberties implicated, ruling against traditional protections of parental rights and informed consent,” Klar explained.

“But the PREP Act is not above the Constitution’s supremacy clause; it’s the other way around.”

Klar warns that the ruling seeks to erase parental rights.

“In Vermont, minor children may obtain transgender hormones and birth control without parental consent, and a 2024 law bars parents from seeing which library books are checked out by their children 12 years and older,” he said.

“Yet these are examples where the child wants something against his parents’ wishes.

“In Vermont’s COVID-19 vaccination case, the child protested and was forced to be jabbed anyway.”

“Tony and Shujen Politella and their son Leo were shocked that their clear expressions of opposition to Leo being vaccinated were ignored,” Klar explained.

“Tony had visited his son’s school with the express purpose of ensuring his child would not receive a COVID-19 vaccine, offering to keep Leo home on the day of an upcoming clinic.

“He was assured Leo would be fine … .”

However, Klar claims that the school had been planning to force the injection onto the child, despite reassuring the parents he would be excluded.

“Leo was given an arm tag displaying another boy’s name and vaccinated despite his vocal protests,” Klar noted.

Then the school refused to explain “how such a gross error occurred.”

Leo now is at a different school, Klar explained.

Then the bureaucracy inflicted a further injury to the family.

“The Vermont attorney general and Vermont court system employed laws designed to grant product liability immunity to Big Pharma to instead insulate incompetent government employees from accountability for their wrongs,” Klar added.

The lawyer said the threat now is that the case has set a precedent.

He notes that other courts “may rely” on its implied preemption by the government of family rights.

“Congress never intended for the PREP Act to abolish fundamental medical ethics or the legal rights of patients and parents,” he explained.

“The PREP Act does not shield public servants from accountability for actions that have nothing to do with vaccine safety or efficacy.

“The Politellas did not sue a vaccine manufacturer for a harmful product; they sued school officials who inflicted very real harm.”

His warning is that those suspicious of various shots now could extend that distrust to schools “and courts that favor negligent or ill-willed works over the rights, and health, of young children.”

Covid mRNA “vaccines” have been linked to a wide range of serious side effects, including sudden deaths and fatal diseases, especially in young people.

In addition, federal health officials have admitted that the injection didn’t prevent someone from getting COVID-19, especially children.



And,