Blogger Comment: Good a taste of their own medicine and at least now we may have truth news and not one big lie after another..that has literally infiltrated the people with the opposite of truth and literally killed/murdered tens of millions by 'NOT' telling the people the real truth (Covid-19 "experimental" injections just one example where millions are continuity dying of all killer diseases now after the jab) ...I admire Trump for sorting these leaches on humanity out and long may it last...as the people need tio know the real TRUTH...as that does save lives, not take them from us...
Corporate media outlets are expressing fear and outrage over President Donald Trump’s threat to shake up the White House press briefing room.
According to reports from those close to Trump, the president-elect will stop giving preferential treatment in the press briefing room to leftist propaganda outlets, The Hill reported.
Journalists are in an uproar as news that the incoming administration will change not only who has access to the president, but the seating position in the briefing room.
The changes are expected to reflect the value that Trump puts on various members of the media.
There have been rumors that podcasters, internet personalities, and non-leftist media could replace major outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post, and television networks in the room’s front rows.
When asked about their reactions to the idea, reporters covering the White House expressed feelings of annoyance, frustration, and dread in conversations with The Hill this week.
Historically, the first row of the James Brady Briefing Room has been occupied by the four major networks of NBC, CBS, ABC, and Fox, as well as The Associated Press, CNN, and Reuters.
The second row is occupied by seats from other larger outlets, including The Wall Street Journal, CBS News Radio, NPR, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Bloomberg.
Almost all of the media outlets given preferential treatment are left-leaning and hostile toward Trump.
In addition, certain news organizations lack formal seating in the room.
Numerous journalists declined to provide on-the-record comments or requested anonymity in order to speak candidly about the potential for a significantly altered press room and the resulting controversy.
“It would be a total mess,” one White House reporter told The Hill this week.
“I would expect people would probably boycott the briefings, though that would put certain outlets in a tough spot deciding if they want to go along with what the Trump people are trying to pull.”
While The White House has always prioritized major news organizations when dealing with the press, Trump has not traditionally held that position.
In an effort to limit off-camera press briefings, the first Trump administration sought to exclude outlets that pushed propaganda.
Among these were CNN, the BBC, Politico, and the New York Times.
Several reporters from Politico, Axios, and Puck News were among those Trump’s campaign barred from attending last month’s election watch event in Mar-a-Lago.
At present, the briefing room can accommodate 49 reporters from various outlets.
Current publications would have to be targeted if pro-Trump sites like Steve Bannon’s War Room were to be granted access to daily press briefings.
Although press credentials are decided by the president’s team, the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) formally controls seating.
After conservative news network One America News Network (OANN) failed to comply with WHCA Covid regulations in 2020, the association famously removed the outlet from the daily White House briefing rotation.
No comments:
Post a Comment