A recent study has concluded that globalist claims of “manmade climate change” are completely fabricated and have no basis in reality.
The researchers found that there is no scientific evidence to support theories of anthropogenic “global warming.”
According to the study, led by leading scientists in Greece, claims that humans cause “climate change” are based on imagination and assumptions.
The study’s paper, authored by lead researcher Professor Demetris Koutsoyiannis of the National Technical University of Athens, was published in the scientific journal AIMS Press.
In the “Conclusions” section of the study’s paper, the researchers write:
“Rather, such claims are based on imagination and climatic models full of assumptions.
“However, as shown in the causality direction in time series produced by climatic models is opposite to that of the real-world data.”
The study found that the narrative of human-generated carbon dioxide (CO2)emissions affecting temperatures is based on fake science.
In the “Abstract” section of the paper, Koutsoyiannis notes:
“The premise of this study is that the climatic system is very complex and subject to perpetual change due to numerous processes, either internal or external to it.”
“The fact that one of them, namely the relationship of climate with atmospheric CO2, is highlighted in the last decades does not correspond to its actual importance as a climate driver.
“The promoted importance is a non-scientific issue, related to the narrative that humans, through their emissions by fossil fuel burning, are responsible for the changes we see in climate.”
The study stated that, under the guise of science, the propagation of the anti-CO2 narrative is being driven by political and economic forces.
In the “Introduction” section of the study, the researchers explain:
“While causality is a fundamental notion in science and life, there also exist fundamental problems on philosophical, scientific, and practical grounds, in its essence and its identification.
“These problems are manifested in controversies, which are not only theoretical but have important social, political, and economic implications.
“Some of the most controversial issues of our time are related to Earth’s climate, not excluding the causal relationship between atmospheric temperature (T) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration.”
The researchers also detail the dramatic changes in climate over massive amounts of time.
They note that the Earth’s climate has been changing naturally for a far greater period than the time since the introduction of “fossil fuel” burning technology over the last 200 or so years.
Before the Industrial Revolution, Earth has been through multiple ice ages and periods of far warmer temperatures than today.
These changes are caused by multiple factors that have nothing to do with human influence.
“Specifically, geological evidence presented by Veizer suggests the presence of running water as far back as we have a record, up to 3.8 or even 4.2 billion years, while it was thought that Earth would be in an ice ball state up to about 1 billion years ago because of the much smaller solar irradiance.
“This is known as the faint young sun puzzle.”
Primarily, the study deduced that human-caused carbon emissions are not causing temperature fluctuations on Earth.
The method taken to conduct the research was analyzing previous geologic periods and comparing their CO2 and temperature trends to try and identify any corollary data.
In the “Introduction” section, Koutsoyiannis states:
“I use temperature and [CO2] data series for all these time frames, namely proxy data for the Phanerozoic, the Cenozoic, the late Quaternary, and the Common Era, and instrumental data for the last seven decades.
“In Section 3, I explain the inappropriateness of deterministic methodologies for detecting causality and I adapt the stochastic methodology proposed in to be used with the above data series.”
Notably, the study confirms that globalists such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), the United Nations (UN), Bill Gates, and other green agenda advocates are promoting the “manmade climate change” narrative because they have an ulterior motive.
No comments:
Post a Comment